Don’t forget the homos.
I guess that is why they did not bother to define “sexual relationship”.
Yeah, that could be a “sticky wicket” if you will. Possibly “homophobic”, we can’t have that now, can we?
I read a AP blurb on this yesterday that mentioned a ceiling of $10.00 before a gift would have to be itemized, notated, etc. I thought, wait, sex between a lobbyist and a legislator would be akin to two $5.00 hookers having a get together and therefore wouldn’t have to be reported?