[V_TWIN]

Hey yahoo, thanks for broadcasting the cop was at fault. Now how ‘bout reporting on the cop being in the right and perp is a thug.................Yeah I know, never happen.

As far as police unions opposing body cameras, I don’t doubt it. For me it’s like red lite cams or urinalysis tests, if your not doing anything wrong you shouldn’t have anything to worry about.

[stremba]

Why then do we have a Fourth Amendment? If you aren’t doing anything wrong, then why are you worried about the police coming and searching your home? That whole “if your not doing anything wrong you shouldn’t have anything to worry about” line is dangerous.

[Lazamataz]

Hey yahoo, thanks for broadcasting the cop was at fault. Now how ‘bout reporting on the cop being in the right and perp is a thug.................Yeah I know, never happen. As far as police unions opposing body cameras, I don’t doubt it. For me it’s like red lite cams or urinalysis tests, if your not doing anything wrong you shouldn’t have anything to worry about.

For the life of me, I will never understand why we tolerate fascist authoritarian p***ks like you on this forum.

You probably have no issue with the NSA spying on us, or the militarization of police, huh?

[Ken H]

As far as police unions opposing body cameras, I don’t doubt it. For me it’s like red lite cams or urinalysis tests, if your not doing anything wrong you shouldn’t have anything to worry about.

No! Monitoring government agents at work is not the same as monitoring citizens. Police body cams are to monitor government agents, whereas government-ordered pee tests and surveillance are examples of government monitoring citizens.

See the difference?