As David Horowitz (who knows their very souls) wrote in June 2000: "...For these self-appointed social redeemers, the goal—"social justice"—is not about rectifying particular injustices, which would be practical and modest, and therefore conservative. Their crusade is about rectifying injustice in the very order of things. "Social Justice" for them is about a world reborn, a world in which prejudice and violence are absent, in which everyone is equal and equally advantaged and without fundamentally conflicting desires. It is a world that could only come into being through a re-structuring of human nature and of society itself.
Even though they are too prudent and self-protective to name this future anymore, the post-Communist left still passionately believes it possible. But it is a world that has never existed and never will. Moreover, as the gulags and graveyards of the last century attest, to attempt the impossible is to invite the catastrophic in the world we know."....
I would only point out that those stupid, slave owning, rich white guys of 1787 designed a system of government that recognized and dealt with man's nature. It is the approach that best ensures national happiness and wealth.
The result of every attempt to create the “New Man,” whether from a secular (communism) or religious (islam) standpoint, is indescribable horror.
No mention of excessive taxation and crippling regulation
Those issues are the great unmentionables of that crew because they know them to be the levers that empower any hope they have of overcoming the 1787 structure that they rage against. "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"
To rid social intercourse of prejudice and violence the state becomes the sole source of prejudice and violence. By turning the entire population against the state the people are united in a singular objective to rid themselves of their oppressor.