Hillary Clinton's Deleted Emails Were Individually Reviewed After All, Spokesman Says

abc ^ | 3-15-15 | SHUSHANNAH WALSHE and LIZ KREUTZ SHUSHANNAH WALSHE More From Shushannah » LIZ KREUTZ More From Liz

[Bubba_Leroy]

Large law firms have teams of associates and paralegals for that.

[bluejean]

That’s right, keep changing the story until the right one seems acceptable. That’ll work. We’re all idiots anyhow.

[stylin19a]

I understand.
If this could be true, this takes this down another road.
Who paid for the law firm ?
Did she expense the cost back to the Feds ?
If so, do the Feds now own the personal emails as well as the business emails ?

[stylin19a]

But that counters the now assertion that her team read every e-mail.

[pgyanke]

This was probably not an after-the-fact operation. I can see Hillary’s team of lawyers sifting through emails daily to make sure nothing damaging to her future survived.

[SaveFerris]

Yes, we must all totally-believe Hillary.

Right there with ya.

[spokeshave]

How long does it take to read through 65k emails ? By how many people ?

Meanwhile in the basement with the server.....

Operators are working on it 24/7

[doug from upland]

Nice, Charles. I think you nailed it.

[Intolerant in NJ]

How exactly did Hillary Clinton's team decide which of her emails should be saved and which ones should be deleted?...doesn't matter - according to the law, it was up to a State Department archivist, not Hillary Clinton's team, to determine which were to be saved and which to be discarded - the concern about who on her team made the decision is just one more red herring.....

[dhs12345]

Good point. And I call BS on ol’ Hil. They probably narrowed it down to specific email addresses and maybe key words and used a software program to do it.

[CivilWarBrewing]

Congress should call ALL of them to testify under Oath.. SEPARATELY AND INDEPENDENT OF EACH OTHERS TESTIMONY.

[onyx]

Well, let’s have a second review, by Trey Gowdy, to cite one.

[Lurkina.n.Learnin]

No e-mails should be deleted. They can argue about which to turnover but deleting anything should be criminal.

[Yaelle]

There had better be a LOT of emails between hillary and her Lady Weiner. They both had addresses on the private server, and Huma had a State Dept salary.

[moehoward]

"Large law firms have teams of associates and paralegals for that."

Super. So tell me, what level of security clearance did this team of email readers have?

[stylin19a]

good question. But if she did go down this road, attorney\client privilege applies ?

[justa-hairyape]

Cannot see lawyers actually deleting them knowing they were violating the law by actually deleting them forever. There must be a backup of the emails that were deleted. Can see them putting the emails into an archival directory or folder in case they were needed for national security or legal purposes.

[Kirkwood]

It would be easy to erase many of the personal emails based on the to: or from: listings, but I don’t believe it when it says that every email was opened and read.

[moehoward]

Of course it applies. The attorney cannot disclose, but she’s the one allowing access to classified records for the attorney to destroy.

These idiots don’t know when to shut up!

[moehoward]

"And suddenly, we find out the team of lawyers DID read the e-mails, they simply “forgot” to mention that in their 9-page response."

Then, a few days later, they remember that, they actually DIDN'T read them because they lacked the proper clearance.