Posted on 03/12/2015 5:01:11 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
“In the years since the Florida issue in the 2000 presidential election, there’s been increasing interest in how election officials get their jobs and how they do their jobs,” Chapin said. “Most recently, in the wake of a presidential commission report, there’s been a push to think a lot more broadly about the notion of professionalism or professionalization in the field of election administration.”
A Connecticut official wants to require formal training for the state’s election administrators to try to avoid another election where voters have trouble casting their ballots.
Denise Merrill, Connecticut’s secretary of state, pitched a plan in February to standardize how towns in the state select election administrators and how those administrators prepare to complete their jobs. Having a non-partisan, appointed official running elections in the state’s towns and cities would increase accountability for officials, she said.
“There’s a pretty widespread agreement that we need more training,” she said. “There just needs to be more accountability, and I think that’s pretty widely recognized.”
Merrill’s push comes after several Connecticut precincts didn’t receive voter lists by the time polls opened on Election Day in November, creating long lines and dissuading many from voting.
Currently, each city or state in the town elects two registrars -- one from each party -- to run elections. Merrill said each party selects the candidate and there is rarely competition for the role. State and local officials don’t have oversight authority since the registrars are elected, and the state also can’t require additional trainings, she added.
“They’re elected, so they’re responsible to the voters. It makes for a difficult system to manage,” Merrill said. “I think the time has come where we look at professionalizing the whole system.”
Under Merrill’s concept legislation, which she has submitted to state lawmakers, each town’s legislative body would appoint someone to oversee election administration. That person would have to have training or experience in order to get the job.
She’s also hoping to launch online training modules for election administrators, which could give administrators a chance to earn a certification through a local community college, she said.
Around the country, more states have looked to professionalizing election administration as a way to maximize efficacy around elections as technology and elections become more complicated, said Doug Chapin, director of the Program for Excellence in Election Administration at the University of Minnesota Humphrey School of Public Affairs.
That’s helped to legitimize the roles as a growing field or profession, he added.
“In the years since the Florida issue in the 2000 presidential election, there’s been increasing interest in how election officials get their jobs and how they do their jobs,” Chapin said. “Most recently, in the wake of a presidential commission report, there’s been a push to think a lot more broadly about the notion of professionalism or professionalization in the field of election administration.”
The Presidential Commission on Election Administration surveyed best practices in election administration in states around the country, considering areas like online voter registration and how new technology affects elections, Tammy Patrick, a senior adviser at the Bipartisan Policy Center who served on the commission, said.
The commission looked at how all phases of election administration contributed to long lines, including growing opportunities for registration and types of voting machines.
“What we really wanted to do was highlight the ways that the states have created to address problems that can contribute to lines. The lines were really what started the commission,” Patrick said.
Many states, including Arizona, Massachusetts and Texas, have introduced online voter registration programs, a practice commission members saw as a best practice in some states they looked at. They also recommended the use of updated technology and early voting practices.
State-run trainings for election administrators aren’t unheard of. Iowa rolled out a program in 2002 that certifies officials after 40 hours of classes, and both Colorado and Washington run programs throughout the year, too.
Colorado Secretary of State Wayne Williams said the state offers in-person trainings around the state, a boot camp to learn new skills and online sessions for election administrators to earn a required certification to run elections.
The trainings cover a variety of topics that administrators encounter during election season, such as accessibility for disabled voters, overseas and military voting and voter registration issues, he said. Williams, a former county clerk in El Paso, said much of the state’s training programs reflect its geography and different sized counties, as well as its polling center model, rather than requiring voters to vote at a certain precinct.
The trainings have improved administrators in smaller counties who juggle several different responsibilities at once, and has helped them to register voters efficiently, he said. The trainings have made it easier to work with fewer people in the office and move voters’ data online, he added.
“It makes the training critical. Having folks who don’t do this every day makes it critical that they have the training so they do know what they need to do when it comes to that time.”
Washington State also has a certification program for election officials, which includes an annual conference where administrators can stay up-to-date on state policies and practices. The state started offering a serious training program after a close legislative race in the early 1990s that ended in state-wide calls for better elections, said Secretary of State Tammy Wyman.
Training is beneficial when there’s a close race and the ways in which counties handle ballots get called into question, Wyman said.
“It really helps us be consistent across the table. That’s the single biggest benefit and why training and certification programs are so important. You want somebody whose ballot is handled in Tacoma to be handled in the way in Spokane. Voters have a confidence that their ballot is being treated fairly,” she said.
Only one national organization has garnered name recognition for training election officials: The Election Center, which partnered with Auburn University to create the Certified Election Registration Administrator program. Tim Mattice, the group’s director of education and training, said the trainings offer students a more national perspective on running elections, and often increases their confidence in what they already know.
Most participants take two-to-three years to complete the trainings, which include taking 12 courses in areas like election systems administration, management and leadership, ethics, and communications, which increases their awareness of challenges they could face and is a chance to communicate with other administrators about how they’ve dealt with similar situations, Mattice said.
Adam Ambrogi, a program director for responsive politics at the Democracy Center, said training is especially important for administrators in smaller counties, where they often juggle many responsibilities.
“They may not have the amount of time that’s needed to develop the best curriculum, to sort through different best practices available and also identify opportunities such as the U.S. Election Assistance Commission,” he said.
In other words they want to train democrats how to cheat better
Probably unionize them too.
Wonder if a photo ID is required to take the class?
After the AP calls a race they don’t want any surprises [this was all part of the Left’s push to punish Walker and get rid of his allies].
April 2011 - Wisconsin: “After Tuesday night’s Wisconsin Supreme Court election, a computer error in heavily Republican Waukesha County failed to send election results for the entire City of Brookfield to the Associated Press. The error, revealed today, would give incumbent Supreme Court Justice David Prosser a net 7,381 votes against his challenger, attorney Joanne Kloppenburg. On Wednesday, Kloppenburg declared victory after the AP reported she finished the election with a 204-vote lead, out of nearly 1.5 million votes cast.
On election night, AP results showed a turnout of 110,000 voters in Waukesha County — well short of the 180,000 voters that turned out last November, and 42 percent of the county’s total turnout. By comparison, nearly 90 percent of Dane County voters who cast a ballot in November turned out to vote for Kloppenburg.
Prior to the election, Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus was heavily criticized for her decision to keep the county results on an antiquated personal computer, rather than upgrade to a new data system being utilized statewide. Nickolaus cited security concerns for keeping the data herself — yet when she reported the data, it did not include the City of Brookfield, whose residents cast nearly 14,000 votes.
Throughout the day Thursday, official canvass numbers flipped the lead back and forth between Prosser and Kloppenburg. While many believed a recount was inevitable, the addition of the Brookfield votes for Prosser could push the justice’s lead beyond the legal threshold that would trigger an automatic recount.
Under state law, Kloppenburg could still ask for a recount up to three days after the official canvass, but would have to pay for it herself.”
LOL!
I had forgotten all about that fiasco.
That was a fun time. Wonder if the Republicans did anything there?
It was delicious.
AP was caught flat-footed and couldn’t “find” enough other votes - thought they had it in the bag.
Democrats needed that liberal judge on the WI Supreme Court to do their bidding but they failed to pull her across the finish line.
A relative who has since passed on held a key position in elections administration for many years.
He had pretty much admitted to me that there WAS NO SUCH THING as a non-partisan election official.
He always felt he should do his best to be even-handed and non-partisan when managing elections. But at the end of the day, he reported to elected officials, who were almost all Democrats. So on various issues he faced a Sophie’s Choice between doing it the partisan way that his Democrat bosses insisted upon, or losing his job.
In Connecticut you can be sure that if this is implemented, it will just be a tool for Democrats in Hartford to enforce their will upon Republican or non-partisan officials at the local level.
No kidding. Whenever a group is called "non-partisan" it sends up red flags that they're liberal.
A good example. He did not like the idea of putting straight-party handles on voting machines. He felt that people should actually THINK about the candidate and what they are voting for on a case-by-case basis (what a concept, eh?)
But his elected Democrat bosses overruled him. They thrived on unions telling their members to vote straight-party. It was either include that handle or be fired.
I remember when the mechanical voting machines had levers only for the Party as a whole, no individual choices. There was talk that the unions in coal mining areas put coal dust (frequent applications by the election officials) on the Republican lever, then inspected the hands of voters as they left. Those with coal dust residue were shown the error of their ways.
That’s a good story, but I’m virtually certain that back in the day there was NO ONE voting Republican in coal mining towns.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.