1 posted on
03/10/2015 11:23:17 AM PDT by
Red Steel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: Red Steel
This means they are going to outlaw them in a document-dump on Friday at 5:01 PM EST.
2 posted on
03/10/2015 11:24:36 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If obama speaks and there is no one there to hear it, is it still a lie?)
To: Red Steel
Accordingly, ATF will not at this time seek to issue a final framework. Good.
3 posted on
03/10/2015 11:25:06 AM PDT by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
Somewhere, out there, a petty, undocumented, half-breed, tyrant is undoubtedly all wee-weed up.
4 posted on
03/10/2015 11:27:48 AM PDT by
Rodamala
To: Red Steel
5 posted on
03/10/2015 11:27:57 AM PDT by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: Red Steel
“and include issues that deserve further study.”
Translation: “Those of you who we have identified will be getting extra special study.”
6 posted on
03/10/2015 11:28:19 AM PDT by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: Red Steel
We lied, we don’t have a good alibi, that is all.
7 posted on
03/10/2015 11:30:30 AM PDT by
showme_the_Glory
((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
To: Red Steel
“Although ATF endeavored to create a proposal that reflected a good faith interpretation of the law and balanced the interests of law enforcement, industry, and sportsmen”... Uh, what a load of crap that statement is. Basically, they got busted. Back handed apology/slap in the face.
8 posted on
03/10/2015 11:31:17 AM PDT by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: Red Steel
Proof we do not need the BATFE.
Stop the funding, make them sell their long folding tables.
11 posted on
03/10/2015 11:37:49 AM PDT by
hadaclueonce
(It is not heaven, it is Iowa. Everyone gets a "Corn Check")
To: Red Steel
Proof we do not need the BATFE.
Stop the funding, make them sell their long folding tables.
12 posted on
03/10/2015 11:38:33 AM PDT by
hadaclueonce
(It is not heaven, it is Iowa. Everyone gets a "Corn Check")
To: Red Steel
I’m one of those 80,000. I basically wrote that the existing law didn’t allow them to ban the ammo. This is really good news. I wonder how many people bought up M855 in hopes of hording it.
14 posted on
03/10/2015 11:39:09 AM PDT by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: Red Steel
The signatories of those letters will of course go into an ATF database. Quickest and easiest “gun registration” gambit I’ve ever seen.
17 posted on
03/10/2015 11:43:24 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Democrats: the Party of slavery to the immensely wealthy for over 200 years.)
To: Red Steel
For something that is supposedly a victory — this smells an awful lot like a trap or a false flag.
18 posted on
03/10/2015 11:44:29 AM PDT by
NewJerseyJoe
(Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
To: Red Steel
Where was this effort when 7N6 was banned?
And the ATF won’t stop. They are just going to wait and quietly ban it during the next national crisis.
19 posted on
03/10/2015 11:44:42 AM PDT by
Azeem
(There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
To: Red Steel
Even if they suspend the ban on M855 - you ain’t gettin’ any.
It’ll be as scarce as .22LR.
20 posted on
03/10/2015 11:47:44 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Red Steel
I wonder how many guys that spent $1+/round in the feeding frenzy after it was announced are kicking themselves in the arse right now...
29 posted on
03/10/2015 12:13:21 PM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Red Steel
So what changed the ATF’s mind?
- - - -
The huge avalanche of negative comments from citizens.
Were caught in their violation to ignore the clear and unambiguous language of the law.
Congress’s legislation to do away with the ATF.
Congress’s legislation to reverse any M855 ban.
The House Judiciary and Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security Committees letter that was signed by 237 Cong critter opposing the ATF.
To: Red Steel
There’s still going to be a run on anything 5.56/.223.
Anybody checked where these guys have their 401ks invested?
32 posted on
03/10/2015 12:24:33 PM PDT by
PLMerite
(Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
To: Red Steel
“Thank you for your interest”
There’s the first lie. :-)
38 posted on
03/10/2015 12:34:15 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Red Steel
I had a case of IMI M193, then I tipped the boat over. Damn.
Seriously, for an old guy in need of cataract surgery, I suspect WPA Military Classic is probably sufficient. Never had a problem with it. Punches a nice hole in regular steel.
I’m waiting for them to ban Russian & Ukraine 7.62x39. Leaving us to the expensive brass stuff.
43 posted on
03/10/2015 12:47:51 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
To: Red Steel
I suspect they are archiving those 80,000 "comments" and putting them under a data base of those suspected of owning an AR-15.
The cudgel and rubber hose treatment in the basement of some DOJ or BATF Lubyanka will eventually establish just who is guilty of actually owning one. But don't worry, if they refuse to initially confess to their crimes they will later. After all, we know The State would not arrest somebody unless they were guilty of something. Eventually, everyone confesses, Comrade. Everyone.
46 posted on
03/10/2015 12:53:23 PM PDT by
Gritty
(Between Iran and ISIS, the enemy of my enemy is ... my enemy! - Benjamin Netanyahu)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson