To: SoConPubbie
I don’t know what you do as a Conservative in Iowa (hoping to get elected, that is)
You go against ethanol and you are cooked. It’s the functional equivalent of social security to Iowa. Sad but true.
2 posted on
03/09/2015 8:40:08 AM PDT by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder; thackney
OK ... does corn for ethenol pay more than corn for flakes, or oil, or syrup ?
3 posted on
03/09/2015 8:42:27 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but, they're true)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
You go against ethanol and you are cooked. It’s the functional equivalent of social security to Iowa. Sad but true. And yet Ted Cruz had no problems standing with his long held opposition to ethanol. Do we want a candidate who changes his position merely because he thinks it's the popular thing to do? Or do we want a candidate who will stick to his guns regardless of audience?
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Those are voters in Iowa. ISIS doesn’t vote! ... LOL ...
22 posted on
03/09/2015 8:53:25 AM PDT by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: Attention Surplus Disorder
Then you better damn do well in the other 49 States whom are tired of paying to have their motors and mileage destroyed.
If THIS is what it takes to get into office, the GOP can HAVE Walker....principled my @ss.
57 posted on
03/09/2015 12:07:41 PM PDT by
i_robot73
("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson