Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/09/2015 8:24:15 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

Kleptocrats are interested only in the fifth and sixth words of the headline (including ‘Study’).

The rest is feel-good window dressing that would be ignored or ridiculed if ignorance were not the most urgent ‘public health’ problem in the nation.


2 posted on 03/09/2015 8:28:47 AM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Beverage tax would grab millions from the poor, do nothing to stop obesity

Stopping obesity is just the excuse. Grabbing the million$ is the objective.............

3 posted on 03/09/2015 8:31:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It's about time the poor started paying more in taxes.

Besides, it's not even their money. We pay for their EBT cards, welfare, WIC, medical care, housing, telephones, etc., etc., etc.

4 posted on 03/09/2015 8:31:38 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Vermont would save a lot more money if it were not the country's worst state for drug abuse.
5 posted on 03/09/2015 8:33:02 AM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Our new Liberal Dweeb Democrat Governor here in PA wants to slap the state sales tax on Child Care Services.

Now THERE’S a move that’s really gonnna help those “working families”!


6 posted on 03/09/2015 8:37:22 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
RE:”One of the more unusual solutions to the state’s budget crisis is a proposed 2-cents-per-ounce tax on sugary drinks.
Sponsored by state Rep. Alison Clarkson, D-Woodstock, H.235 aims to raise about $34 million by taxing beverages like soda, fruit juice, teas and sports drinks.”

Author is probably talking about ‘fruit drinks’ not ‘fruit juices’

Fruit drinks are flavored water with sugar added because processed sugar is cheaper than fruit is.

7 posted on 03/09/2015 8:45:15 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Illinois has had the “sugar tax” since 2009. Now the legislature and governor are talking about raising it again. That’s right, our “republican” governor.


8 posted on 03/09/2015 8:45:41 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Taxation sure discouraged smoking, much more than other methods.


9 posted on 03/09/2015 8:47:15 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
While the tax would help fund Vermont’s obese budget...

Maybe THAT'S the obesity we should be talking about, BUDGETS nation wide.

FMCDH(BITS)

10 posted on 03/09/2015 8:54:25 AM PDT by nothingnew (Hemmer and MacCullum are the worst on FNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’ll just shop in NH.


11 posted on 03/09/2015 8:54:53 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Raise taxes but never, ever consider cutting the fat out of the budget.


12 posted on 03/09/2015 9:31:47 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not that I support another tax, but I’m okay with making “the poor” pay their “fair share.”


13 posted on 03/09/2015 9:36:11 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Gabz; Mears; SheLion

First they came for the druggies, then they came for the smokers, now it is time to get the soda drinkers! Next up, chocolate eaters and eventually those that will not exercise!

The tobacco warriors won, now they get to live with the empowerment that they handed their rulers. Enjoy it FReepers that celebrated your “win.” Enjoy your “Brave New World.”


14 posted on 03/09/2015 9:49:56 AM PDT by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So a 2 liter bottle of store brand soda, which sells for 79 cents in Maryland would have a tax of $1.26?


15 posted on 03/09/2015 10:02:28 AM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Study: Beverage tax would grab millions from the poor, do nothing to stop obesity

So, the university study agrees with the secret taxpayer funded gov. study done before this policy was recommended. ;-)

16 posted on 03/09/2015 10:43:34 AM PDT by TigersEye (ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
We extort from the upper classes and the middle classes, so how come the poor get a pass? No doubt about it, it is time to nail the poor with regressive taxes. The progressives will "feel their pain"...NOT. The progressives have insulated or exempted themselves so they could care less about the poor.
17 posted on 03/09/2015 11:55:12 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson