For me, this case is a sanity check. If the court does not find that the FedGov is not authorized to set up exchanges by Obamacare, our SCOTUS has lost every shred of respect I have left for it.
It will have officially jumped the shark.
” For me, this case is a sanity check. If the court does not find that the FedGov is not authorized to set up exchanges by Obamacare, our SCOTUS has lost every shred of respect I have left for it.”
This should have been closed for discussion in the first half hour.It was a no-brainer. We lost.
[[For me, this case is a sanity check. If the court does not find that the FedGov is not authorized to set up exchanges by Obamacare, our SCOTUS has lost every shred of respect I have left for it.]]
They’s already lost and shred of credibility they once had when they allowed the VIOLATION of the constitution to pass I nthe first place
Crudely illustrated- man USED TO BE free to wander this country and live entirely off the land, NEVER being forced to purchase ANYTHING by our government. He had the right to be left alone- he could eat off the land, make his own clothes, and live and die In the wilderness IF he so chose to do so- NEVER being forced to purchase anything- it was his constitutional right to be left alone- He could roam from state to state- and never be obliged to anyone for anything As long as he didn’t break any laws-
Then along comes obummercare, which now forces him to purchase something against his will, and turns him into a criminal if he doesn’t- VIOLATING his right to be left alone!