Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/06/2015 8:04:52 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

I think 9.6 is low.


2 posted on 03/06/2015 8:07:03 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

CNN was bubbly this morning with the great unemployment news. Many of us know better.


4 posted on 03/06/2015 8:09:05 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Even adjusted, it still does not count people who are underemployed or are working at reduced rates.

If you're not a big campaign bundler for Obama, or working in a government position, you are quite unlikely to be doing better under Obama.

6 posted on 03/06/2015 8:13:08 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is this corrected for baby boomer retirements?

We are a demographic bulge. A drop in participation rate should follow.


12 posted on 03/06/2015 8:50:26 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Remember when the Rats were slamming Bush’s 4% to 5% unemployment rate as the “worst economy since the Great Depression”?


13 posted on 03/06/2015 8:51:14 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Falcon 105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson