For any part of a law to be severable Congress must include a Severability Clause. The Peelousi/Reid Congress forgot to include, gruber must have had the dems in mind with his “stupidity” assertion.
Nobamacare is so lawfully unstable “all the halfrican King’s horses and all the halfrican King’s men can not keep it from falling off the wall again and again. If the dems are able to keep it propped up past Jan. 2017 with the Congress and POTUS, then to quote hitlery, “What possible difference will it make” as the Country dissolves.
Gruber is on tape describing the necessary ‘churn’ in the insurance markets zerocare would bring, which caused millions and millions to lose coverage they wanted, so why would the ‘churn’ of ruling for the plaintiffs matter? Couldn’t a amicus be submitted to Kennedy that the insurance cos were delighted with ‘churn’ when it was churning THEIR way?
They didn't forget, Waxman ( IMMIC ) removed it, it was full steam ahead, no exemptions or exclusions, that and Scott Brown but them in end-run mode.
Today in Bill Bennett, his guest was noting Kennedy may go on a tangent of was the State Exchange language Coercion or not. That is really an obtuse read the stitches on the fast ball thing to say IMHO. And if he goes that route we are more screwed than Hogan's Goat, and this opens the door to NO "statue" Congress being irrelevant and we have a Supreme Executive more so than we have now and ALL Congressional Statue and be tweaked, going back as far as you want...
Last Exit Ramp for the Republic! the train porter yells....