Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark

“With malice toward none...”

...except the hundreds of thousands of innocents his generals had just killed in the South. As a proportion of the population today, it’s millions.

A speech can’t take away these blunders. No other nation required a war to end slavery. The amount of money the union spent on the war could have bought the freedom of every slave.


5 posted on 03/04/2015 10:04:01 PM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ReaganGeneration2

+1


7 posted on 03/04/2015 10:53:19 PM PST by Pelham (The refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganGeneration2
The amount of money the union spent on the war could have bought the freedom of every slave.

"Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained."

8 posted on 03/04/2015 11:04:55 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganGeneration2
...except the hundreds of thousands of innocents his generals had just killed in the South.

I think the Southerners had a lot to do with that as well.

No other nation required a war to end slavery.

No other nation has a large section willing to go to war to protect slavery.

The amount of money the union spent on the war could have bought the freedom of every slave.

In retrospect that's probably true. But it's also irrelevant because there was no desire in the South to end slavery, either through compensated means or any other.

11 posted on 03/05/2015 3:37:22 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganGeneration2

It’s too bad that south chose to go to war and cause the loss of all those soldiers. BTW: the south refused to entertain the notion of a federal slave “buy-back” program.


18 posted on 03/05/2015 6:33:58 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganGeneration2
>> ...except the hundreds of thousands of innocents his generals had just killed in the South. As a proportion of the population today, it’s millions. A speech can’t take away these blunders. No other nation required a war to end slavery. <<

Tell that the confederates who STARTED the war to PRESERVE slavery.

35 posted on 03/05/2015 11:29:17 AM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganGeneration2
No other nation required a war to end slavery.

American exceptionalism?

The amount of money the union spent on the war could have bought the freedom of every slave.

To make a purchase, you have to have somebody willing to sell, and there weren't many slave owners in the Deep South willing to sell in 1860, and wouldn't be for years to come. If we tried to force them to do so, then pretty much what you complain about would have happened anyway.

44 posted on 03/05/2015 1:53:00 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson