-— Like the Catholic church a thousand years ago few if anyone can/will read the bible or any other history to know the church leaders have been radically changing it to fit their own goals. -—
Probably because the printing press wouldn’t be invented for another 450 years.
That’s why a hand copied Bible cost the modern equivalent of $30k., and why Bibles were chained to pulpits.
It’s no coincidence that Luther’s novel doctrine of Sola Scriptura followed shortly after Gutenberg’s invention.
“Probably because the printing press wouldn’t be invented for another 450 years.
That’s why a hand copied Bible cost the modern equivalent of $30k., and why Bibles were chained to pulpits.
It’s no coincidence that Luther’s novel doctrine of Sola Scriptura followed shortly after Gutenberg’s invention.”
I agree, and today with the power of Mass media, and the internet we have a great advantage in disseminating the nature of their corruption.
Our only problem is the enemy is as skilled and even better funded than we are in selling their own web of lies. But the truth as we have found it can be found in analyzing the self-serving corruption that results from their system of supposed & actions. At the end of the day they are supposing they have the supreme legislative power to redefine the law, rather than simply enforce it on a case by case basis. They demonstrate this power not merely by their disregard of language but inconsistency of even their own application much less the historic application.
The law as written by the people & congress cannot after all be two or more things at two or more different times without a legislative act in between. Thus when they say marriage today is one thing, even thou everyone knew it was something different for thousands of year. The laws of the people have been changed.
When Abortion was illegal one day and made legal again the next, the law has been changed.
When States were free to have regional representation in their Senates just like Washington does, for a hundred year, then Suddenly demanded that the same body be popular representation instead. The law has been changed!
The rules of common law in jurist prudent are not simply follow the higher court, they are keep your rulings consistent not only with the text, but with past practice as well. The truth is when the mere word of a group of men in robes changes the law, we are not living under laws but rather those men. For a true law is not the word or discretion of men who may change their minds in any case. But the unchanging and consistent text applied equally and uniformly to all men in all cases. Thus the reality is, when a court can change the ‘law’ there is not rule of law, but the men of the court.