Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Titus-Maximus

How is this different than the Christian baker that would not make a cake for a LGBYLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ wedding?


8 posted on 03/03/2015 11:20:56 AM PST by Cyman (We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cyman

The baker was running his/her own business. If the baker worked for a bakery and the bakery requested he/she make a cake for a gay wedding and the baker he/she should be fired.


12 posted on 03/03/2015 11:23:51 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Cyman

The baker owns the business.


13 posted on 03/03/2015 11:24:06 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (I do not doubt that our climate changes. I only doubt that anything man does has any effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Cyman
Simple. The Baker owned the bakery. This guy is an employee of COSTCO. I would imagine if the owner of a bakery was OK with the gay wedding cake, but an employee said they would not do it, the employee would be looking for a new job.
17 posted on 03/03/2015 11:26:36 AM PST by MPJackal ("From my cold dead hands.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Cyman
How is this different than the Christian baker that would not make a cake for a LGBYLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ wedding?

The baker was not in the business of selling cakes for celebrating deviant relationships; had never done so in the past; and never indicated in any of her business dealings that she was interested in or willing to engage in that business.

In this case, the person works for another business that has sold these products for years, advertises them to the public, etc. So the employee had full knowledge that these products were a part of the normal business conducted by their employer at the time he/she was hired. When the employee refused to do the job for which they were hired, the company did not fire the employee, but gave them another assignment that did not compel them to violate their religious principles (an option not given to the baker).

19 posted on 03/03/2015 11:28:43 AM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Cyman
You're requiring the baker to participate in a ceremony that they have religious objections to.

If a gay couple went to a baker and said, "Give me that cake" bought it and left, the baker wouldn't have a problem with it.

The cashier (who, by the way, doesn't own or run Costco) took a job at a place that sells pork and alcohol and expects people not to come to his register with pork and alcohol.

37 posted on 03/03/2015 12:02:14 PM PST by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson