That SOB needs to be stopped.
________________________________
We had that chance in 2012, but 4 million decided to stay home. This will not be stopped.
stop talking sense.
We are being pushed toward another revolution and that’s what Obama wants so he can declare martial law and take over as dictator, cancelling any elections...Congress will not stop this traitor....
So what is your excuse for 2014? Seems we loaded up Congress, but what is that getting us?
At least the ones that stayed home stuck to their principles. That doesn’t make me feel any better for some reason.
The ONLY "chance" we had of defeating Obama's agenda in 2012 was to nominate a conservative. Unfortunately, Romney adopted as scorched-earth policy used his money to make sure that EVERY conservative candidate was destroyed.
I honestly don't know why the RINO lovers even care that Romney lost, NOTHING would be different with Romney as president.
People need to understand that Obama is basically imitating Romney's policies as governor of Massachusetts:
- Romney imposed Romneycare. Obama duplicated it for Obamacare.
- Romney imposed taxpayer-funded abortion, so did Obama.
- Romney imposed same-sex "marriage," so is Obama.
- Romney tried to ban AR-15s, so is Obama.
What you need to get through your head is that when the voted are given the choice between two liberals with nearly identical positions, the one with the "D" after their name will typically win.
I wonder... Obama had precincts with 1110 % voter turnout, 100% for him. Now, if that can be done, a percentage can be skimmed off the top and the votes changed to make the vote tally approximate the poll numbers people had been bombarded with for months.
I think Fraud in the biggest reason Obama 'won' the second time.
What states were flipped by those who stayed home? Shouldn’t we start working them now?
Still whining because the Pubs put that loser put against a MArxist?
Since I am the RINO List dude, some here call a blog pimp, I would like to take the responsibility for defeating Mitt “RINO” Romney. I would also like to remind some of the Romney-Bots that first the whole lesser of two evils argument is a negative argument for someone. That right there kills it for you off the bat. If your best argument is that he is less bad than the alternative, you kind of have already lost the argument, which is why you DID lose the argument and the election.
Romney never was nor is a Capitalist. He was and is a Merchantilist. He was and is an East Coast Liberal. He was on the Main Street Republican board along with Juan McCain and Lindsey Grahmnesty which accepted money from George “Dr. Evil” Soros. The way we know it was the old wrinkly evil guy was because Michelle Malkin discovered and published the info years ago.
Now, about da guns. If you apes think that RINO Romney would have protected the guns from gun grabbers, please explain these things from the Mittster!
From the Washington Post:
“Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney has actually been more active than Obama on gun control — albeit during his time in Massachusetts. Since leaving office, he has moved away from those positions.
While running for Senate in Massachusetts in 1994, Romney supported background checks and a ban on some assault weapons. “That’s not going to make me the hero of the NRA,” he said. Running for governor in 2002, he said, “We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts — I support them. I won’t chip away at them. I believe they help protect us, and provide for our safety.”
As governor, in 2004, signed an assault-weapons ban in the state. However, that law won support from some gun-rights advocates by making it easier to get and renew a firearms license. Romney also raised the state’s gun-registration fee from $25 to $75.
Romney joined the National Rifle Association in 2006, a few months before launching his first presidential bid. “I’m a member of the NRA and believe firmly in the right to bear arms,” he said in 2007.
Pressed by NBC’s Tim Russert on the issue that year, he said, “I support Second Amendment rights, but I don’t line up 100 percent with the NRA. They take some positions that are different than mine.” He continued to support the assault-weapons ban, reaffirming that position in a 2008 debate.
However, in a subsequent interview with conservative bloggers, Romney said, “I don’t support any gun control legislation, the effort for a new assault weapons ban, with a ban on semi-automatic weapons, is something I would oppose. There’s no new legislation that I’m aware of or have heard of that I would support.” “
For a snort worthy display of his “positions” see http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_Gun_Control.htm
How about this:
“I’m after the NRA’s endorsement,” Romney told an audience in Derry, N.H. “I’m not sure they’ll give it to me. I hope they will.”
These guys here were WAY too nice to the Mittster mostly because they omit a TON of evidence that the above sites do give. But even then they give him a half flip.
This video will make you laugh or snort depending.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/23/mitt-romney-gun-control_n_1696538.html
And finally this from the Gun Owners of America BEFORE the election.
http://gunowners.org/mittromney-2012.htm
PLEASE stop the lies that RINOmney would have been this champion of Conservatism and a defender of our guns. By this time, he would be “mulling over” what to do to enforce greater gun control.
Too bad the GOP was so stupid as to run a liberal rino for a second time against the will of the right wing who supports the republican platform but not the rino liberal GOPees of the Bush type.
Didn’t you know the lesser of two evils is not a moral inequality?