Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Hydrazine
I have a great idea. Let SW run their planes into the ground without inspections. Then the Feds will come in and shut them down while those affected by the crashes will sue them into obscurity.

I take it you don't like Southwest? Well, that's your prerogative. But to me, this just further confirms my high opinion of them. Anyone can claim that safety is their highest priority. But this company put their money where their mouth is. Upon discovering merely that they had missed some inspections (NOT that there was necessarily any immediate risk), they voluntarily removed 20 percent of their operating capacity to rectify the issue.

Bravo, Southwest.
5 posted on 02/25/2015 10:35:42 AM PST by bus man (Loose Lips Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: bus man

Remember what happened to Alaska Airlines flight 261 on 31JAN2000 with the failed jackscrew?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Airlines_Flight_261

It was due to inadequate lubrication and end play checks of the jackscrew that only takes an hour to do. The airline also progessively increased the time between those lube and checks.

SW, like any other airline, knows what needs to be done and when for aircraft maintenance. You think some just “forgot”? I don’t think so. They were slacking off trying to save money for the airline.

The inspectors need to clamp down a little harder on SW to ensure nobody “forgets” what needs to done.


7 posted on 02/25/2015 10:46:17 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson