Posted on 02/20/2015 5:32:37 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Black activists who are part of Project 21, an initiative of the National Center for Public Policy Research, say the idea of a Department of Justice lawsuit against Ferguson, Missouri, over the fallout from the shooting death last year of black teenager Michael Brown is unwarranted.
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.wnd.com ...
Well that explains why I agree with them that a Department of Justice lawsuit against Ferguson, Missouri, over the fallout from the shooting death last year of black teenager Michael Brown is unwarranted. I thought the activists were of the liberal nature, so when I saw that they said it was unwarranted, I said to myself. I agree with them. Now I know why!!!
How can you base a movement on a lie?
Everybody knows it did not happen.
Why does it get repeated?
Any lawsuit should be against Holder by the town and PD of Ferguson. Not the other way around. The damage Holder has done and keeps doing should bring up evidence of criminal actions has doen during a civil suit against him so can then find himself in the exact place he wanted Wilson to go.
They bring this suit and the town dies. Who would want to go to a town who held back not only the cops but the national guard. Property looted and burned while Sharpton and Holder cooked Marshmallows and weenies.
Keep the lie alive
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.