Skip to comments.
L.A. Times to NRA: Government’s ‘Responsibility’ To Regulate 2nd Amendment
breitbart ^
| Feb. 20, 2015
| AWR HAWKINS
Posted on 02/20/2015 3:07:17 PM PST by PROCON
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
These people live in an alternate universe.
OK Lib, which school would you rather have YOUR kids attend?
1
posted on
02/20/2015 3:07:17 PM PST
by
PROCON
To: PROCON
>>In other words, shall not be infringed does not mean shall not be regulated and/or controlled.
It take a lot of college to become THAT stupid.
2
posted on
02/20/2015 3:10:27 PM PST
by
Bryanw92
(Sic semper tyrannis)
To: PROCON
IronJack to LA Slimes: Government's responsibility to regulate news media.
Sauce for the goose, beotches ...
3
posted on
02/20/2015 3:16:31 PM PST
by
IronJack
To: PROCON
Regulate THIS!
4
posted on
02/20/2015 3:19:01 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: IronJack
5
posted on
02/20/2015 3:20:55 PM PST
by
PROCON
(Always give 100%---unless you're donating blood.)
6
posted on
02/20/2015 3:21:43 PM PST
by
PROCON
(Always give 100%---unless you're donating blood.)
To: PROCON
“reasonable gun control”
Imagine if you will a world in which that means a steady trigger pull. :-)
7
posted on
02/20/2015 3:25:59 PM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: PROCON
I like Breitbart's publication legacy and I'm still thinking his killing wasn't an accident.
The Breitbart news organization still does a good job in publishing revealing information.
8
posted on
02/20/2015 3:26:17 PM PST
by
OldNavyVet
(http://sunsetridgemsbiology.wikispaces.com/file/view/Darwins+Ghost.pdf)
To: PROCON
The extremist left uses the word “reasonable” and then begins by framing the position around their concept of what is reasonable. A reasonable gun control stance would be to take note of the areas where gun violence predominates, and then to dispatch more police into those areas. Or just disarm all residences within those areas. But that might have a disparate impact on the extremist left voting constituencies.
9
posted on
02/20/2015 3:27:20 PM PST
by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: PROCON
latimes IPOS/SPOS alert needed. I-N-F-R-I-N-G-E. Look it up in the funk’n wagnells asshats. It is one of the many things the govt is NOT supposed to mess with. Sheesh.
10
posted on
02/20/2015 3:27:25 PM PST
by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: PROCON
and reminding the organization that it is the governments responsibility to protect the public through reasonable gun control laws.
-----------
and reminding the organization that it is the governments responsibility to protect the public through reasonable gun control free speech laws.
11
posted on
02/20/2015 3:29:02 PM PST
by
ForYourChildren
(Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
To: PROCON
LA Times insists women should be disarmed.
Apparently their view is let the police handle it later.
12
posted on
02/20/2015 3:31:33 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
let the police handle it later.. Nope. They don't even process rape kits like they're supposed to.
13
posted on
02/20/2015 3:35:45 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: goldstategop
No sweat — rape victims can be driven to the hospital by the cops later.
14
posted on
02/20/2015 3:36:04 PM PST
by
expat2
To: PROCON
How would that paper enjoy some regulation of the 1st Amendment’s freedom of the press?
To: PROCON
. . . the Times reminds us all that Americans have a 2nd Amendment right to own guns, but its not an absolute right. "Shall not be infringed" means that owning guns is an absolute right, and more. Our right to bear arms is also an absolute. A property owner can ban our guns from that private property, at the cost of losing our business, but government has no such authority on public property. Gun laws are obeyed only out of fear, never out of a moral obligation.
16
posted on
02/20/2015 3:38:09 PM PST
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: PROCON
right after it regulates the 1st...
17
posted on
02/20/2015 3:50:58 PM PST
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
To: Bryanw92
It’s getting real close to where Americans need to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights and take back America.
18
posted on
02/20/2015 4:01:54 PM PST
by
maddog55
To: Bryanw92
>>In other words, shall not be infringed does not mean shall not be regulated and/or controlled.But many FReepers believe it's okay to regulate whether a felon can own a gun after he has served his time.
If you can regulate a certain group, it all becomes subjective who and what can be regulated.
19
posted on
02/20/2015 4:02:32 PM PST
by
Las Vegas Ron
("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
To: OldNavyVet
The coroner for Brietbart died under mysterious circumstances as well.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson