Posted on 02/20/2015 4:28:06 AM PST by thackney
It's a painful time to be in the oil business. With the price of crude oil about half what it was six months ago, companies large and small are being pressured to cut costs.
On the front lines are oil services companies that do everything from drilling to providing electrical power at well sites. Hundreds of thousands of jobs are threatened as companies try to adjust.
Gary Evans, CEO of the oil and gas company Magnum Hunter Resources, has a tough message for the people who provide critical services to companies like his: "We've got to lower our cost," he said to a packed auditorium in Houston last week.
He says that means the services his company provides — everything from fracking to trucking — are going on sale, big time.
When there's a big sale coming at Neiman Marcus, Evans says, you don't spend your money until the sale prices appear. And right now, he's waiting for the deep discounts in oil services before he spends any more money.
"No drilling, no completion, no fracking, no nothing. Cut it completely off. ... We tell our vendors, 'When you're ready to do it at 40 percent below what you were charging me in December, we'll go back to work.' "
The room is silent, absorbing the prospect of a 40 percent cut in income.
"I hate to say that to a lot of my service company friends, but that's the reality," Evans says. "We've had over a 50 percent drop in commodity prices, so we've got to have a bigger drop in service costs."
Out in the hallway after Evans' bombshell, Ken Sapien says his engineering firm, RRC, which provides things like seismic survey and electrical grid designs for drilling sites, is feeling the squeeze.
"Yes, we've been approached by a few of our clients, asking us to drop our prices," Sapien says. And the firm doesn't have much choice if it wants to hang on to business, he says.
"If you don't take the cut, there's somebody out there that's gonna work for that price. So ... for us, it's more about the relationship. I mean, money is important, don't get me wrong. But it means more to continue to have those guys as our clients."
Earlier this month, Halliburton, a giant in the oil services businesses, said it is laying off up to 6,400 workers. Before that, Baker Hughes, which is merging with Halliburton, announced it is slashing about 7,000 jobs. And another giant, Schlumberger, is slashing 9,000 jobs. More than 100,000 industry layoffs have been announced worldwide so far.
"There's a tremendous amount of people" being laid off in the industry, says Clint Walker, the general manager of CUDD Energy Services, a medium-sized player in the oil fields that provides services including fracking, water management and well control. "And the thing about these jobs — they're good-paying jobs. Most of these jobs are in the $80,000 to $120,000 range."
Walker says what his firm provides to oil companies is knowledge, sophisticated equipment, reliability and safety. He says that becomes a challenge if your income is cut 40 percent.
"You just have to get through it, and create enough cash flow in order to maintain that equipment," he says. "Because the last thing you want to do is put a piece of equipment that's not reliable and — God forbid — get anybody hurt out there."
As Walker suggests, the deep cost-cutting could increase the risks of accidents and injured workers. It could also increase the risk of accidents that damage the environment.
That's an unwelcome prospect for an industry already under scrutiny because of its use of controversial hydraulic fracturing, not to mention incidents like the massive BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.
Walker says the industry can only hope for a quick turnaround in prices. But another big increase in oil inventories was announced Thursday — sending prices lower once again.
The big boys requiring contract machining services for parts on their service equipment sent a demand letter to their vendors in December to require a 25% cut in prices to get their next Purchase Order. This has been a tsunami through the large number of contract machining job shops here in Tulsa.
What is the publication?
Strange, I know that was filled out, or it would not have let me enter submit.
http://www.npr.org/2015/02/19/387539924/as-oil-prices-tank-firms-large-and-small-feel-the-pain
No problem.
I just didn’t recognize the writer’s name.
Thanks for the info.
The stone age didn’t end because we ran out of stones.
Neither did the iron or bronze age.
Funding your enemies while sending your jobs overseas waiting for them to develop the next technology is not a winning strategy.
Develop our own oil/natural gas resources. While building up those jobs and industries, uses some of the profits to develop Methane Hydrates. Centuries after that, let that day figure out the next step.
The vendors certainly were raising prices when demand for their products and services were skyrocketing. This is just the flip side conditions that led to high prices for everything related to the oil business.
Of course. The buyers wanted faster delivery and larger quantities. The vendors paid premiums for overtime, expedited deliveries, etc. Just dropping the demand down will lower prices. Not to mention copper, steel etc have dropped in price with the slowing global demand as well.
It might eventually get down 40%, but I doubt it. I suspect demand will keep it above that price.
If a customer asks for a 40% reduction, they will settle for 25-30%. As you point out, the vendors’ expenses will also be going down significantly.
The question many of us wonder which will happen first. Wage cuts (per hour, hours already cut) or price rise enough to support current wages.
The demand and competition for workers drove wages up dramatically; so it is not unreasonable to expect wages to fall considerably.
The smart people knew it wasn’t doing to last forever and didn’t increase their lifestyles significantly and saved a bunch of money.
It is hard on morale and loyalty to cut wages even in the face of reality. It can be the reason to use bonus and retention payments during the boom time.
There is less resentment from worker to not receive a bonus when others are laid off, versus a wage cut. You and I may see no difference but I used to be a department head; that matters to a lot of workers.
Liberals sure do not like lower oil prices considering how they only seem to talk about the negative aspects.
During a prior run up one of the PIRG weenies was whining that the majors were not investing all the $$$ they were making in new production. And, of course, we all remember the predictable calls by RAT politicians for Salem witch trial style investigation of big oil. These are the market environments to balance those the whiners screech over.
The long term survivors think long term. In this industry you don't take on excessive debt or spend everything you make during the boom times. As surely as the sun will rise tomorrow the bust will follow...and this applies equally for employees.
The survivors have learned to keep money in the bank and be choosy about opportunities. Just as one can now drill at a discount if you have money in the bank, opportunities will be everywhere for those with $$$ in the bank.
It's a fascinating business, and not one for the faint of heart.
Both, I suspect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.