Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeshark
Thanks for that article Lakeshark, not sure what you think that article proves, because it very clearly shows what I have been posting, Scott Walker supports both Amnesty for those here illegally, no differentiation between being legal and getting full citizenship, and he also approves of an Open Border in that article. No Border Enforcement:

"you hear some people talk about border security and a wall and all that. To me, I don't know that you need any of that if you had a better, saner way to let people into the country in the first place."
48 posted on 02/19/2015 7:50:21 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie; All
Your reading comrehension is awful: WALKER: Actually, I'm glad you asked about that, because the Wausau newspaper erroneously quoted me on that. They listed a video on their website that actually showed that the person who asked the question said that, not me, and ever since then I've had to deal with reports over and over again.

BAIER: So that's wrong?

WALKER: That's wrong. It's not what I said. I have said I believe we need a legal immigration system. I have said repeatedly I oppose amnesty. I think we're a nation of immigrants, but we're also a nation of laws. We should have a legal way for people to come into this country either for work or for citizenship, just like we have for generations. Part of that deal is we need to make sure we have a border that's secure, not just for immigration reasons, but as I mentioned, for national security.

52 posted on 02/19/2015 7:53:58 AM PST by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie; Lakeshark

It’s an interesting piece. As hard as this-less-than-friendly news outlet tries to slam Walker (even at the end where they’re telling you how to interpret Walker’s words - make them up - to fit into their scenario) it just isn’t there. But there is the headline - which is what people absorb.

[AND THEN THERE IS THE SAD TRUTH THAT MOST PEOPLE WON’T TAKE THE TIME TO GO TO A LINK AND JUST READ IT. FOR SOME REASON THEY THINK SOMEONE ELSE’S INTERPRETATION IS JUST AS GOOD - BUT THEY WOULD BE MISTAKEN]

http://www.wausaudailyherald.com/story/opinion/2015/02/17/scott-walker-immigration-path-citizenship-wausau-interview-amnesty-border/23558209/


53 posted on 02/19/2015 7:54:31 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson