Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
I've said it before and I'll say it again. If the conservatives would spend the same energy getting the delegate allocation method changed as they do opposing the particular RINO flavor picked by big money, we could actually win.

Neither is the big problem the order of the primaries, the marathon structure or anything of the sort so much as it is the allocation of delegates.

A fairer system would award:

  1. One fifth of the delegates based on electoral vote value.
  2. One fifth of the delegates based on GOP congressmen, U.S. Senators, governor and control of state legislatures.
  3. Three-fifths of the delegates based on the ability of the state to actually deliver electoral votes to the GOP presidential ticket in November.

    And, yes, Wyoming might actually end up with more delegates than Massachusetts under this formula. If it is unfair, then it is unfair to Wyoming, which has delivered 12 of 12 possible electoral votes to the GOP ticket over the last four election cycles whereas Massachusetts has deliverd exactly 0.


9 posted on 02/17/2015 9:51:26 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

I might take it a step further. I would not necessarily mind going back to the idea of “brokered” conventions and smoke filled rooms-—as long as isn’t pot.


10 posted on 02/17/2015 9:54:43 AM PST by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson