Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy
I have a hard time really understanding why that was done.

If that is,in fact,an accurate assessment of the situation it *is* difficult to understand.The only plausible explanation is some enormous issue regarding national security.Or,perhaps,a desire to save himself and/or his father some sort of embarrassment.

5 posted on 02/16/2015 1:54:46 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama;America's First "Third World" President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

}|Read the full article at

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/the-dangerous-lie-that-bush-lied/question-4699446/?link=ibaf&q=The+Dangerous+Lie+That+%E2%80%98Bush+Lied%E2%80%99


6 posted on 02/16/2015 1:55:18 PM PST by Hypo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Gay State Conservative
One explanation I have heard is that we may not have gotten all of the WMD. If we told the world that there were goodies lying around in Iraq to this very day, bad people might go there and get their hands on stuff. So, we pretend that there isn't anything, and we hope that no one goes and looks.

I do not find this at all convincing, but it is one reason I have seen as to why we never made a loud claim about finding Saddam's stash.

11 posted on 02/16/2015 1:57:49 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (The dog days are over /The dog days are done/Can you hear the horses? /'Cause here they come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson