Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BLM clears way for petroleum reserve development
Fuel Fix ^ | February 14, 2015 | Associated Press

Posted on 02/16/2015 5:07:21 AM PST by thackney

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management issued a final decision Friday that it said will open the way for the first oil and gas production from federal lands in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

The decision is a shift from the alternative that BLM had earlier selected as its preferred option. But it aligns with the alternative chosen by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

BLM-Alaska spokeswoman Lesli Ellis-Wouters said BLM had indicated it would take into account the Corps’ decision in making its final determination. If the two agencies were not on the same page, ConocoPhillips Alaska would not have been able to go forward, she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at fuelfix.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: energy; northslope; npra; oil
Excerpted for AP content

This approval is a long time coming for land that was specifically set aside for Development of Oil Production, just like the Coastal Plains of ANWR.

1 posted on 02/16/2015 5:07:21 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


2 posted on 02/16/2015 5:09:19 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

BLM decision opens door for first oil production in nation’s largest reserve
http://bakken.com/news/id/232718/blm-decision-opens-door-first-oil-production-nations-largest-reserve/

The Obama administration has agreed to support a ConocoPhillips plan that would open the nation’s largest reserve to oil and gas activity, allowing an eight-mile gravel road to be carved through a creek setback meant to protect a traditional Native hunting area.

Conservation groups decried the record of decision issued Friday by the Bureau of Land Management, saying it would hurt habitat and wild resources in the Indiana-sized National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

The agency, however, said it was selecting the development alternative that was chosen as the least environmentally destructive by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

ConocoPhillips said on Friday it was happy so far but was reviewing details of the decision, which includes mitigation measures that will also affect the project.

“We are pleased that the BLM has approved a road route that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers selected in its record of decision,” said Amy Burnett, a communications specialist with the company. “We are reviewing the details of the (record of decision) and cannot comment on the exact details until the review is complete.”

While BLM’s decision authorizes development at the field in the reserve’s northeastern corner — called Greater Mooses Tooth Unit 1 — ConocoPhillips must still acquire a drilling permit and right-of-way approval. The company has said the field could produce up to 30,000 barrels daily, infusing the trans-Alaska pipeline with new oil and providing new revenue for a resource-dependent state recently battered by the plunge in oil prices.

ConocoPhillips had recently said it will delay a final investment decision for the project in part because of permitting delays — it had expected project approval last fall — though it plans to continue shooting seismic surveys and advancing engineering efforts this year.

ConocoPhillips had made the road through the setback a top demand but also said the mitigation requirements must be acceptable for the project to move forward.

A statement from BLM announcing the decision said the agency is working with ConocoPhillips on safe and responsible energy development.

“The strategic planning and mitigation measures agreed to by ConocoPhillips are important as we continue to support thoughtful and balanced development in this region and are critical to compensating for the impacts of this project,” said Janice Schneider, assistant secretary for Land and Minerals Management.

The requirements include an $8 million contribution from ConocoPhillips into a compensatory mitigation fund, the statement said. Mitigation projects supported by the fund will be developed through a transparent process.

Also, a regional mitigation strategy will be developed with input from multiple stakeholders, including the region’s Native residents, to determine the best measures for future development. It will benefit subsistence users most directly impacted by the project.

Several “best-management practices” will be required to minimize impacts, including “robust” spill prevention and response measures.

The project calls for construction of a 12-acre drilling pad to support up to 33 development and injection wells.
The road to the development — stemming off another ConocoPhillips project outside the federal reserve — will encroach into the three-mile-wide Fish Creek setback, an important subsistence area for the residents of the nearby Inupiat village of Nuiqsut.

Still, the road and an elevated pipeline will remain 2.5 miles from the creek at their nearest point.

The setback is one of the “special areas” receiving unique protection in BLM’s reserve management plan created in 2013, which also includes the Colville River special area, important for peregrine falcons, and Teshukpuk Lake, used by large numbers of migratory birds.
The 23-million-acre reserve was established in 1923 to provide an emergency oil supply for the U.S. Navy. No commercial project has yet occurred there.

Representatives of several environmental groups blasted BLM’s decision in a statement sent early to media, more than three hours before the agency publicly released its decision.

The Alaska Wilderness League and five other groups said the road would cause lasting effects on the habitat, wildlife and subsistence values in the reserve.

Cindy Shogan, executive director of Alaska Wilderness League, said her group is disappointed because the decision does not prioritize the most environmentally sensitive approach and sets the tone for future development in the reserve.

“BLM has fallen short on its duty to manage our public lands with the strongest protections for the Arctic’s fragile wetlands and wildlife,” said Lindsey Hajduk, Alaska program director for the Conservation Lands Foundation. “The only good that can come out of this decision is if BLM steps up and further protects the reserve’s special areas for future generations to enjoy.”
The project had divided BLM and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps had said it would issue a wetlands permits based on Conoco’s plan, saying it was the least environmentally destructive in part because it requires less gravel fill and a shorter road. BLM, which manages the reserve and has the final authority, had initially said it preferred an alternative plan with a road that would not violate the Fish Creek setback.

But BLM promised a final decision that would be “federally unified,” with robust mitigation measures.

Nuiqsut, about 600 miles north of Anchorage with a population of 450, was also divided. The tribal government did not want the road passing through the Fish Creek setback. But the Alaska Native village corporation supported Conoco’s plan, saying it was better for the environment.

The decision from BLM was expected to be the third strike in what Sen. Lisa Murkowski has termed a “triple gut punch” against Alaska thrown by the Obama administration. The Interior Department, which oversees the BLM, has recently said it will seek further protection against oil and gas development in the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. It also removed areas of the U.S. Arctic Ocean from oil and gas leasing, such as the Hanna Shoal, a biological hot spot for species including walrus.


3 posted on 02/16/2015 5:12:25 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

bump for later,,,,,,


4 posted on 02/16/2015 5:18:47 AM PST by piroque ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Conservation groups decried the record of decision issued Friday by the Bureau of Land Management, saying it would hurt habitat and wild resources

Bears and Caribou love those warm pipelines....


5 posted on 02/16/2015 6:06:25 AM PST by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney
“BLM has fallen short on its duty to manage our public lands with the strongest protections for the Arctic’s fragile wetlands and wildlife,” said Lindsey Hajduk, Alaska program director for the Conservation Lands Foundation.

I wonder if Lindsey has ever been to the North Slope. Spring break, perhaps. Better bring a big can of Deep Woods Off.

6 posted on 02/16/2015 6:10:23 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

Ooops.... those bears are in danger. They are in excess of 4’ off the ground and not tied off. Osha will get them


7 posted on 02/16/2015 6:19:07 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“saying it would allow for construction of an 8-mile road through sensitive wetlands and tundra.”

8 miles, that’s nothing


8 posted on 02/16/2015 6:47:38 AM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson