Food and water is not "artificial."
Her husband? He WANTED her to die, he had a girlfriend and he had life insurance on her, and besides that, he had probably choked her which caused her injury in the first place.
Jes is probably as devout a Catholic as Barack was a devout Chrisitan (non-denominational).
He's another Democrat for McCain/Romney etc. (in the primaries only)
In 2000 the media found such a "registered Republican" who was funding Al Gore's election recount (and in fact he'd voted for Al Gore).
I loathe the Ass. Press.
Well.
A point in JEB’s favor.
I remember. Jeb backed down at the last minute.
He could have had a place in history.
I always thought the reason Jebbie failed was that Mr. Schindler was not a large Bush contributor.
https://www.ewtn.com/morals/end-of-life.htm
...
Q. What about the case of Terri Schiavo?
A. In Terri’s case, while there was some disagreement as to her exact medical condition, she was not dying. Indeed, when the other artificial means were withdrawn she continued to live, so that the withdrawal of her food and water directly caused her death. This was a violation of the natural law and the law of God.
...
In summary, nutrition and hydration, like bathing and changing the patient’s position to avoid bedsores, is ordinary care that is owed to the patient. This is true even if it is delivered artificially, as when a baby is bottle-fed or a sick person is tube-fed. Nutrition and hydration may only be discontinued when they cannot achieve their natural purposes, such as when the body can no longer process them, or, when during the death process they would only prolong the person’s suffering. If such a case the patient dies of the underlying disease. On the other hand, if starvation and dehydration is the foreseeable cause of death, to withhold or withdrawn nutrition and hydration is gravely immoral.
Do not trust Jeb Bush, period.
Go Michael! We hate Jeb’s guts too!