Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alabama's Stand Against Gay Marriage Crumbles
ABCNews ^ | February 15, 2015 | KIM CHANDLER

Posted on 02/13/2015 9:03:48 PM PST by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Ray76

Bttt


21 posted on 02/14/2015 4:33:29 AM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot
That's his point. Marriage isn't mentioned in the Constitution, and the Federal Constitution says the Federal government has no authority over what isn't mentioned.

No but the Due Process Clause is included in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, and the Equal Protection Clause is included in the Fourteenth. Federal Courts used those to justify overturning laws against interracial marriage and I assume they're using the same clauses to rule on same sex marriage.

22 posted on 02/14/2015 4:45:38 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Importantly, Judge Moore has reminded them that they work as elected officials under his jurisdiction. So he can sanction them if they follow the orders of that federal judge. And he should.


23 posted on 02/14/2015 8:05:40 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

So what if a judge refuses to marry a same-sex couple?


24 posted on 02/14/2015 8:08:43 AM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Federal Courts used those to justify overturning laws against interracial marriage . . .

It's true they did, but they didn't have the authority. They were making it up. We need to reclaim the plain meaning of the Constitution if we want to reclaim the country. Banning interracial marriage may be daft and ultimately undefinable, but saner states are free to attract citizens who don't want daft laws on marriage—that's our defense against stupid laws, not Federal ambulance chasing. Hard cases make bad law, and ultimately destroy the Constitution.

If we want a government that's less corrupt, we have to play by our own rules.

25 posted on 02/14/2015 2:45:20 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I guess it’s because God wants MORE GAYS in Alabama. /s


26 posted on 02/14/2015 2:59:21 PM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

“Banning interracial marriage may be daft and ultimately undefinable, but saner states are free to attract citizens who don’t want daft laws on marriage—that’s our defense against stupid laws, not Federal ambulance chasing. Hard cases make bad law, and ultimately destroy the Constitution.”

The hard reality is that bans on gay marriage are going to be ruled unconstitutional and a violation of civil rights.

The court, I think, is not viewing this issue through the lens of what’s acceptable by God or anything in the Bible.
It’s being looked as any two individuals. Do two individuals have the right to marry. If they do then gender doesn’t come into play.


27 posted on 02/14/2015 3:53:39 PM PST by snarkybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: snarkybob
The court, I think, is not viewing this issue through the lens of what’s acceptable by God or anything in the Bible.

It’s being looked as any two individuals.

Not disagreeing with what you're saying. What I'm saying is that this is a culture war of the centuries. In a war, you don't accept the enemy's premises, which you correctly identify above. I'm not saying this is easy or quick. Just that it's our job to wear down the culture with our premises instead of theirs.

We're in this for the long—very long—haul, as in "The gates of hell shall not prevail against it." Praise God and pass the ammo.

28 posted on 02/14/2015 4:53:28 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

“We’re in this for the long—very long—haul,”

Agreed. JMHO but it’s not going to turn the other way for a very long time.
I don’t expect to see a turning in my lifetime.

Right at this moment, it’s the other sides time. It will be their time until their time passes.

Gay marriage is going to be the law of the land. At some future point it may swing back the other way.


29 posted on 02/14/2015 5:03:36 PM PST by snarkybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson