[Flick Lives]

And incestial marriages, well as the government takes more and more from inheritences this only makes sense. Spouses inherit without tax ramifications so some day parents will be leaving their children the family business or family farm without tax penalty if they marry them.

Ever wonder why FedGov has been steadfastly against polygamy? That's why. FedGov knows it could potentially lose a huge chunk of tax revenue if polygamy or multiple marriages were allowed. You'd have a "union" that could potentially never die; thus no inheritance taxes.

Conversely, FedGov pushes gay "marriage" because it benefits FedGov. Any gay couples trendy enough and stupid enough to "marry" will face, ta-da. the marriage tax penalty on their Federal taxes.

[Dad was my hero]

Interesting take on it. I’d love to see it challenged in court so I could hear how the government twists its own logic that the liberals have so used to try to destroy marriage.

[Slambat]

“That’s why. FedGov knows it could potentially lose a huge chunk of tax revenue if polygamy or multiple marriages were allowed.”

The Catholic church felt the same way about priests getting
married. They wanted to keep property and wealth within the
church and not loose it to inheritance. It’s also a good
example of homosexual infestation of a major founding of
modern morals and principals in our society. And just like
American politicians there are some who are there just to
put up a front of opposition to fool people that they are
against this perverted takeover but actually are part of it.