Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NFHale

Um, not quite. In colonial times the vast majority of the population on this continent was satisfied with the King’s rule, even as the rule taxed them more and more and intruded into their homes more and more. It was only a small percentage of the population which revolted against the King’s Rule. Sadly, we don’t even have a remnant of the fervor of the founders, so the Republic will be aborted under little bath house barry bastard boy’s kingship. The misdirection has worked. The real kings (the banking oligarchy) go unseen as we the people who still give a sh*t bitch over little king barry soetoro’s rule.


9 posted on 02/12/2015 8:04:15 AM PST by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

“...In colonial times the vast majority of the population on this continent was satisfied with the King’s rule, even as the rule taxed them more and more and intruded into their homes more and more...”

You just reiterated my point. They were comfortable with it.

The ones that were uncomfortable were pissed off, and motivated to push the envelope, and did.

But - regardless. I’m not seeing anything remotely resembling that happening in my lifetime, barring a direct move against guns. I think that would definitely touch off wide spread push back.

Maybe.


15 posted on 02/12/2015 10:23:29 AM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson