[cuban leaf]

When you have a government with almost god-like surveillance capabilities, it is impossible to even form a revolution. It will be infiltrated and destroyed before you can say Bob’s your uncle.

And if you do it by yourself, you are Timothy McVeigh.

[Politically Correct]

When you have a government with almost god-like surveillance capabilities, it is impossible to even form a revolution. It will be infiltrated and destroyed before you can say Bob’s your uncle.

When surveillance gets a million hits, where do they go first? Surveillance only is effective if your opposition is small.

[grobdriver]

A good read, although for many of us I think it is only what we already understand.
This regime has been very careful to avoid that one thing that would exceed the threshold of, "Time to dig up the weapons".

For McVeigh that threshold may nave been very low - many are teetering on it now - but there will need to be a moment, I think, to kick start what many of us are ready for.

I think that's the goal of the globalists: to keep matters at a point of just below boiling, but never triggering in a majority that feeling of, "OK, I've had enough".

For sure organization beyond close (very close) friends will be futile, and communication is compromised before it even starts... but maybe Jon Ross gave us a clue.

[The Duke]

I have often thought as you do, but then I think of how the system was successfully changed in the Phillipines. And that was a peaceful revolution.

I also think that there is an opportunity for positive change once a nation gets into hyperinflation. After all, governments run on money.

[NFHale]

People are comfortable. They have air conditioning, food, cars, televisions, PCs, etc., They don’t feel threatened.

You don’t have revolutions when people are comfortable.

We’ve also been deliberately detached from our history, culture, traditions, and legacy.

The Left has done a masterful job of subverting society, and has met virtually NO opposition - other than Internet bitching.