[wagglebee]

I'll have to back the court on this one. She has had six, which is more than most of us taxpayers can have, both physically and financially.

So, in principle at least, you fully support something like China's one child policy which is turning into a nightmare for the Chinese because there simply aren't enough Chinese women of child-bearing age for the men to marry.

Once society gives conditional assent to eugenics, they open the door for whatever else the deathmongers propose. What's the difference between six babies and two.

When Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. penned the repugnant phrase, "Three generations of imbeciles is enough," he set the stage for what would eventually become the Nazi Holocaust.

[Vigilanteman]

Did you even bother reading the entire article? Everyone of the woman’s children is a ward of the state. Even more key is that her uterus is so thin that a seventh would probably kill her. Do you think that is a more humane solution than what the court decided?