Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilly Poll - Who do you want to run for president on the Republican side?
BillOReilly.com ^ | January 30, 2015

Posted on 01/30/2015 5:47:27 PM PST by SoConPubbie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: xzins
Enriching criminals is self-evidently bad policy - I don't know what taking anyone to court has to do with that.
81 posted on 02/01/2015 9:01:29 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: xzins

So I’m a bit confused as to whether people watch Fox at all? If Gutfeld is liberal then this former Marine is a bowl totin hippie. Gutfeld espouses many conservative views and is entertaining doing so.


82 posted on 02/02/2015 4:56:53 PM PST by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

See #22 post a minute after post #18


83 posted on 02/02/2015 8:34:52 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

As you can tell, post #22 shows I’d intended also to write about Williams.

Now about Gutfeld being entertaining. Everybody has their own cup of tea, but I can’t switch fast channels fast enough when I happen to wake up and find “Red Eye” as my only Fox option. And I gave it a chance. I really dislike it. It’s dumb and not funny.

If Fox is looking for a conservative Stewart, Gutfeld is not him.

Gutfeld on ‘the five’ is a bit better. He tries to be meaningful. Reading his notes, though, reminds me of Alan Colmes. And I had the same issue with Colmes. He gives the impression that even he’s not sure if he’s real.


84 posted on 02/02/2015 8:50:19 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

You take them to court for creating a danger zone in your country the same as the drug war takes them to war.

Isn’t that the rationale behind the drug war, that drugs degrade and endanger the community?


85 posted on 02/02/2015 8:56:27 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Just saw this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3253292/posts


86 posted on 02/02/2015 8:59:19 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Does the individual have a legitimate complaint if it [the war on drugs] ‘enriches criminals’ but an individual cannot take that to court because he’ll be told he has no standing since that particular individual has experience no provable harm?

Enriching criminals is self-evidently bad policy - I don't know what taking anyone to court has to do with that.

You take them to court for creating a danger zone in your country the same as the drug war takes them to war.

I take who to court, and why? Shouldn't bad policy be defeated in the forum of public debate and then in the voting booth, rather than in court?

Isn’t that the rationale behind the drug war, that drugs degrade and endanger the community?

That's one professed rationale out of many.

87 posted on 02/03/2015 9:23:00 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: xzins

That is fair


88 posted on 02/04/2015 4:20:09 AM PST by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Jane Long
I remembered to tell Jane Long, but not you!

BOR's poll results:

1. SCOTT WALKER

2. BEN CARSON

3. TED CRUZ!!!
89 posted on 02/09/2015 3:52:38 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Jane Long

Thanks Onyx! :)


90 posted on 02/09/2015 5:47:09 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson