Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steelfish

“But this latest version, which includes the “incitement to imminent violence” phrase – that is, which criminalizes speech which incites violence against others on the basis of religion, race, or national origin – has succeeded in winning US approval –despite the fact that it (indirectly) places limitations as well on speech considered “blasphemous.””

meanwhile the race baiters nodded their empty heads in agree as michael brown’s step father yelled “burn this b!tch down”...


5 posted on 01/24/2015 11:14:33 AM PST by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: God luvs America
“But this latest version, which includes the “incitement to imminent violence” phrase – that is, which criminalizes speech which incites violence against others on the basis of religion, race, or national origin – has succeeded in winning US approval –despite the fact that it (indirectly) places limitations as well on speech considered “blasphemous.””

I would suggest that any statement supporting UN control over the American population is, in fact, speech that qualifies as "incitement to imminent violence."

70 posted on 01/24/2015 1:15:24 PM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson