Why Obama does not start with banning insults of Christians?
Exactly! The very idea of banning criticism would be a poisonous bitter idea, that any other American President would spit out of his mouth. He can make whatever rules he wants, but his clout, his credibility, his gravitas if you will sink lower each day. That little bizarre stunt with Glo-zell didn’t do anything to boost the power of the Presidency. Laws can be nullified or revoked, is all I’m saying.
How about banning the killing of Christians by mooselimbs? Yea right. /s
Sharia’ law comes in on a misty night on little cat feet...
There is NO compromise between the clear words of the US Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and this apostasy of the monotheistic Middle East religions known as “Islam”, with its concomitant code of Sharia’ law.
The Koran is a very bad restatement of all the most severe, unrelenting and uncompromising stages of punishment by a terrible and unforgiving deity that appeared to exist (in some minds, anyway) in the Old Testament. These were known at different times as “Ba’al”, “Moloch”, or “Set”, and worship was not so much to exalt and praise these deities, as it was to placate them and avoid their vengeance.
Which is pretty much how Allah is regarded today. Vengeance is delegated to the most motivated of the followers of Allah, and they are given full authority to pursue those who are apostates of Allah.
Which include just about every non-Muslim in the world, and a good many of the Muslims whose allegiance to the EXACT words of The Prophet is in question.
because In the socialist / muslim minds there is no way to insult Christianity.