We shall defend the right of fellow citizens of the bearded barbarian persuasion to express their feelings and acts of hatred toward us.
Now the philosophical question is: is it more important for the 1st Amendment to survive or for the country to continue to exist when the two propositions are mutually exclusive?
We may come to a point in history that we must make such a decision.
Their acts of hatred include killing nonbelievers. This is murder and against our laws. Therefore it does not fit our society.
There are many things that are illegal because they destroy the order that society needs to be civil. Just because someone says that they are a religion does not give them the right to break laws. Inciting a riot is illegal just as should be inciting murder as Islam does. Just as is slavery which Islam allows.
I do not support the protection of a so called religion when it is used to break our laws.