Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper

The First Amendment states that the People are permitted the freedom to exercise a religion of their choosing and bars Congress from ESTABLISHING a religion. This was in response to the English monarchy’s relationship with the Church of England and its use as a religious bully pulpit.

There’s nothing in the BoR that prohibits a religiously-based business from barring non-Christians from their employ. Likewise, there’s nothing prohibiting a jailor from disallowing a bad grooming practice.

Our entire government system is infected.


7 posted on 01/21/2015 6:45:55 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia
There’s nothing in the BoR that prohibits a religiously-based business from barring non-Christians from their employ. Likewise, there’s nothing prohibiting a jailor from disallowing a bad grooming practice. Our entire government system is infected.

The ruling was not based on the First Amendment. It was based on a federal statute which prohibits prisons receiving federal aid from infringing on inmate's religious freedom unless absolutely necessary to protect the security of the prison. Hence the 9-0 decision, written by Alito.

14 posted on 01/21/2015 7:41:25 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson