1 posted on
01/19/2015 5:52:13 PM PST by
Nachum
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2 posted on
01/19/2015 5:52:35 PM PST by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: Nachum
Yes, more SWAT teams and armored personnel carriers.
To: Nachum
Net Neutrality is all about bringing the internet under the authority of the FCC.
4 posted on
01/19/2015 5:54:23 PM PST by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
To: Nachum
Just another agency going rogue.
5 posted on
01/19/2015 5:57:07 PM PST by
Domandred
(Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
To: Nachum
For what?
HAM radio operators?
CB operators?
Someone with a noisy transmitter of one flavor or other?
Oh yeah, FCC wants to own the internet...
...gotta stomp out those thought crimes at those “undesirable websites” that “disrespect Obama” I guess?
6 posted on
01/19/2015 6:10:19 PM PST by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: Nachum
What next, Children & Family case workers packing heat?
9 posted on
01/19/2015 6:17:36 PM PST by
Birdsbane
("Onward through the fog!" ... Oat Willie)
To: Nachum
They need to be armed to make sure that free speech is safe on the Interwebs.
12 posted on
01/19/2015 6:26:13 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Offend a Christian and he is obliged to pray for you. Offend a Muslim and he is obliged to kill you.)
To: Nachum
Here in Boston, there is a pirate on 87.74,
B87FM. They run normal FM station commercials, and they cover the metro area from a location in Dorchester. No need to worry about no steenkin' FCC!
13 posted on
01/19/2015 6:26:51 PM PST by
cynwoody
To: Nachum
Because FCC knows they're about to do something bad.
Like EPA style raids but on network providers.
14 posted on
01/19/2015 6:33:38 PM PST by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: Nachum
Yeah, because computer nerds and tech weenies have such a long history of physical violence... {snort}
15 posted on
01/19/2015 6:39:29 PM PST by
ThunderSleeps
(Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
To: Nachum
More totalitarian FEDERAL CONTROL. The Obama Marxist wet dream.
16 posted on
01/19/2015 6:43:40 PM PST by
EagleUSA
(Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
To: Nachum
Better load and holster my 9mm before tuning in Rush tomorrow.
They better come during commercial breaks so the gunfire does not interrupt the show.
17 posted on
01/19/2015 7:04:57 PM PST by
Scrambler Bob
(/s /s /s /s /s, my replies are "liberally" sprinkled with them behind every word and letter.!)
To: Nachum
David Hunt, the FCC IG, argued before the House Energy and Commerce Committee that the oversight of communications programs requires his team to investigate violations in potentially dangerous settings, thereby justifying the need to arm selected investigators.What percentage of investigations involve "dangerous settings?"
I hope none of those "dangerous Settings" involve the Amish?
Because in that case we may even be talking "racism."
18 posted on
01/19/2015 7:10:25 PM PST by
publius911
(Formerly Publius6961)
To: Nachum
It’s to protect the mezzuins
22 posted on
01/19/2015 7:28:54 PM PST by
MrBambaLaMamba
(Obama - "I will stand with the Muslims")
To: Nachum
23 posted on
01/19/2015 7:30:56 PM PST by
gaijin
To: Nachum
radio and tv must be more edgy then when i was growing up
25 posted on
01/19/2015 8:16:45 PM PST by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: Nachum
I wonder how many government agencies have their people walking around with firearms, and I wonder how many of those people use their own (not taxpayer funded) firearms, and went through the background check...
Okay. Who’s laughing out there?!
29 posted on
01/20/2015 1:04:33 AM PST by
RandallFlagg
(Vote fraud solution: Stake, Rope, Sugar and Bullet Ants.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson