Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

See, now that's what I'm talkin' bout!
1 posted on 01/19/2015 5:06:02 PM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Maceman

I am praying for Romney, Jeb, and Christie to divide the liberal vote so we can finally elect a conservative. It’s the only hope America has left.


2 posted on 01/19/2015 5:08:22 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Which is exactly why it won’t be allowed to happen. Now, faux conservatives bleeding off votes from real conservatives? That’ll happen!


3 posted on 01/19/2015 5:08:54 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

What is it you’re talking about?


5 posted on 01/19/2015 5:14:42 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

I’m wondering if Romney is really serious about running, or if he’s just there to thwart Jeb? I know that sounds a bit kooky, but when Fred Thompson ran in 2008, there was a lot of talk that he was doing so to peel potential Huckabee supporters off in order to help McCain get the nomination.

Either way, I don’t want Romney as a candidate. I voted for him in 2008, because I knew what another 4 years of Obama was going to bring. But we conservatives have so many good options out there for 2016. We don’t have to settle for Romney, and we shouldn’t settle for Romney.


6 posted on 01/19/2015 5:14:53 PM PST by DemforBush (Q. Why didn't the German get to eat his cake? A. Because it was stollen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Howdy Doody’d be OK. Or, micky mouse .
Let’s avoid the Huckaby/Peroit technique.


8 posted on 01/19/2015 5:17:01 PM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Which is why it won’t happen.


11 posted on 01/19/2015 5:18:53 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Offend a Christian and he is obliged to pray for you. Offend a Muslim and he is obliged to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

“This is going to be corporatist on corporatist crime,” said Steve Deace, a respected conservative radio host from Iowa. “And whenever corporatist blood gets spilled, we all win.”


Amen.


13 posted on 01/19/2015 5:22:08 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

This race will show the relative strength of the conservative vs. moderate wings of the GOP, that’s for sure.


14 posted on 01/19/2015 5:22:45 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

It could work unless the conservatives/Tea Party support half-a-dozen or more conservatives.

Some 20 Republicans have apparently expressed interest in 2016. That field needs to be reduced very fast.


15 posted on 01/19/2015 5:26:22 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Unfortunately it doesn’t matter if Ted Cruz had the support of 90% of Republicans and Romney or Bush each had 5%. The RNC will fund either Romney or Bush (probably Bush because he’s further to the Left).

The actual level of public support, or what the public wants, is totally irrelevant to the RNC. They play by an internal, private “cash to play” mset of rules that none of us are privy to. We are outsiders, just curious onlookers, to them. All they care about is the status quo cash machine. Us peasants are just footstools to them.


16 posted on 01/19/2015 5:27:31 PM PST by navyguy (The National Reset Button is pushed with the trigger finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Maybe maybe not....one thing is true: conservatives MUST get behind one candidate early and ride that horse to victory. No more of this mamby pamby stuff waiting to see who might win


20 posted on 01/19/2015 5:42:58 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Wouldn’t that be kinda like someone arguing with his reflection in the mirror?


22 posted on 01/19/2015 5:46:02 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman
And Help The Tea Party...I hope it does.

Like others have said here I suspect Willard is only running to knock out any conservative from the nomination ????

24 posted on 01/19/2015 5:51:53 PM PST by virgil283 (Like UPS I don't go left..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Exactly what I have been advocating here for well over a year; it is about time they got their vote split so that we can win a general election.


27 posted on 01/19/2015 6:12:19 PM PST by logic101.net (If libs believe in Darwin and natural selection why do they get hacked off when it happens?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

In 2012, the Republican candidate with the most money was Rick Perry. Texas oilmen were standing in line to flood his campaign coffers with contributions.

However, Governor Perry had to drop out of the presidential race early because of a gaffe he made during one of the debates that he could never recover from.

So the lesson is that money is not the be-all and end-all of politics. More important is doing well in debates, being able to inspire people, connecting with the voters.

Unfortunately, during the 2012 Republican primary season, none of the candidates was particularly outstanding during the debates, which left primary voters divided among a number of mediocrities, and Mitt Romney, the most polished and least objectionable, walked away with the nomination.

We don’t know yet if any of the 2016 Republican presidential hopefuls is a charismatic enough debater to dominate the primaries and prevail early, or if we’ll be faced with another long battle of mediocrities.

But we do know that the big-money candidates — Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney — will not be able to buy the nomination any more than Rick Perry was able to do in 2012. So why are we so worried about them?


32 posted on 01/19/2015 6:46:03 PM PST by Bluestocking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

The debate between Jebediah and Cruz will be like a wrasslin’ match between Barney Fife and Earnest T. Bass.
You know what I’m talking about.
I can’t wait.


33 posted on 01/19/2015 6:54:40 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Hate to break the news to Romney, but he will get about 55% of the white vote (of those who even turn out), and the Democrat will SWEEP the minority vote and coast to victory, as happened in 2008 and 2012.

Now...if a TEA PARTY person runs (i.e., Ted Cruz), then he gets 65% of the white vote, plus a MUCH HIGHER turnout of whites, plus a decent percentage of Hispanics (they tend to also like white conservatives...maybe not a majority, but close enough to 50% to not be a factor). Given all that, the REPUBLICAN SWEEPS TO VICTORY.

That is the fear of the DEMOCRATS, and the fear of the Republican Establishment - the ONLY THING worse (to them) than a Democrat winning is a Republican winning that doesn’t answer to them.


34 posted on 01/19/2015 7:14:45 PM PST by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

Shoot, while we’re considering moderates for pres, let’s fill the bus. Add Orrin Hatch and John McCain, too.

Let Cruz be the only one to speak to the conservative base.


38 posted on 01/19/2015 8:38:14 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman

This is an ultra left-wing blog designed to look like a legitimate news site and will even pop up on google searches as “news” articles when you look up a given topic.

That said, I would not be so sure about this. Romney could use Bush or another candidate as a foil as a mushy moderate and at least try to shape the narrative that *he* is the strongest, more conservative alternative.


39 posted on 01/19/2015 8:45:35 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Maceman
A Mitt Romney-Jeb Bush Brawl Will Divide The GOP Establishment And Help The Tea Party
Like that's a bad thing??!? (like being an islamophobe? ;-) )
40 posted on 01/19/2015 8:58:16 PM PST by Impala64ssa (You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson