Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The main reason that the abortion movement cannot quite disentangle itself from its roots in 19th-century eugenics is the niggling, persistent fact that it doesn’t really want to.

The author nails it!

1 posted on 01/16/2015 10:27:50 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Coleus; narses; Salvation
Pro-Life PingP
2 posted on 01/16/2015 10:28:16 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 01/16/2015 10:28:56 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The March for Life in Wash. DC is this week. Jan. 22nd. Be there! Pray for life from conception to natural death.


4 posted on 01/16/2015 10:34:18 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

And whether Amanda Marcotte wants to admit it or not, in her view too much melanin in the skin is a good reason for abortion.


5 posted on 01/16/2015 10:44:10 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

“niggling”

Hey, isn’t that racist?


7 posted on 01/16/2015 10:51:37 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

If you aren’t familiar with Amanda Marcotte, she is a walking cliche of leftist/feminist garbage. It takes a truly degraded culture for there to be a way for her to earn a living writing opinion pieces.


8 posted on 01/16/2015 10:58:13 AM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

It’s too bad that eugenics got itself such a bad name due to those who pushed it based on bad science.

The problem is that the author here uses “eugenics” as a scare word, much the way liberals use “racist.” It’ supposed to make us refuse to even think about the issue under discussion.

Eugenics, as such, is simply the recognition that the laws of genetics apply to humans just as much as they do to bulldogs or pedigree pigs.

If successful people, which in our society on average means more intelligent people, have fewer children than less successful people, it is very nearly certain that our society will in future have a larger proportion of less-intelligent people. That will have all sorts of consequences, many of which we can’t even imagine.

But we’re not even allowed to talk about it.

BTW, I’m not specifically addressing Marcotte’s comments, only the author’s use of the word “eugenics” to close down discussion.


10 posted on 01/16/2015 2:04:50 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson