Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

.
That is your opinion, but it is counter to the clear meaning of the first amendment.

Why should we put up with it?

The more information that moves, the better off society is.

.


15 posted on 01/16/2015 9:02:08 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

Nope. It’s jurisprudential history. The first amendment says “Congress shall make no laws...”, it doesn’t restrict your employer in any way. If it did ABC wouldn’t be able to fire Rosie Perez.

We should put up with it because that is the nature of voluntary relationships. I can quit my job if my employer takes a public stand I disagree with, and they can fire me for the inverse.

It might be in the best of society, but it is often NOT in the best interest of companies. There’s always some views they don’t want to be associated with, some companies don’t want to be associated with any views. It’s pretty common for government employees to have to be publicly neutral, most folks who wear uniforms are under strict regulation to not wear those uniforms to any political event if they’re not there in an official capacity. Police, military and fire departments don’t want to be seen as “picking sides”.


16 posted on 01/16/2015 9:11:01 AM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson