Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Feehery: Support the Speaker (telling piece from Establishment Oligarchy bag-man)
thehill.com ^ | 1/5/15 | John Feehery

Posted on 01/06/2015 6:31:59 AM PST by cotton1706

From 1910 to 1943, it was fairly common for some members of the Republican Party to vote for somebody for Speaker of the House other than the choice of the conference.

Progressive Republicans initially joined with Democrats in rebellion against the autocratic Joe Cannon, and the habit stuck. And in every Speaker’s election during that time, up to 11 members would cast their votes for a person other than the two candidates put forward by the two major parties.

ADVERTISEMENT

That habit died in 1945, and from the close of World War II to the close of the Cold War, neither Republicans nor Democrats had any defections in their votes for leader. And then, in 1997, a few moderate members of the Republican Conference decided to send a message to Newt Gingrich that they weren’t comfortable with his leadership. Since that time, in every election for Speaker, there has been at least one defector — and sometimes several more — in both parties.

Usually, the protests have come from surviving Blue Dogs, against the liberal leadership of Nancy Pelosi. They have wanted to demonstrate their independence from the San Francisco Democrat, which they believed would help them back home with their constituents.

But two years ago, a different kind of protest manifested itself, unique in the history of the House. Tea Party Republicans, backed by outside groups that were overtly hostile to both President Obama and to so-called establishment Republicans, were elected to the House and the Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; gope; johnfeehery; moderates; teaparty; uniparty

1 posted on 01/06/2015 6:32:00 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

2 posted on 01/06/2015 6:33:37 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Coups are usually attempted in the wake of political disappointment, not after a political triumph.

I guess he thinks the chance to enact the Republican policy positions of the past several years can be characterized as a political triumph.

3 posted on 01/06/2015 6:36:01 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Voting no to liberalism equates to overtly hostile?


4 posted on 01/06/2015 6:36:33 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

This guy is a tool supporting a tool.


5 posted on 01/06/2015 6:46:37 AM PST by freedumb2003 (AGW: Settled Science? If so, there would only be one model and it would agree with measurements)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
...backed by outside groups...

It's a Koch conspiracy!!!

6 posted on 01/06/2015 6:47:18 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
These groups seem to be most upset about a provision — included in the large spending package that passed at the end of last year — that would significantly strengthen the power of the two political parties by increasing the amount of money that donors can give to party committees. 

Can you blame them after the Mississippi Masacre? The full weight of the party came down on top of McDaniel, including getting Democrats to vote in the Republican primary. Now imagine that multiplied many times over. The machine will protect itself.

7 posted on 01/06/2015 6:54:08 AM PST by KarlInOhio (The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The future of the Republican Party rests upon the speaker choice today.

If: Bonehead (aka, witless, spineless dork)
Then: RIP GOP

It is far from a rumor that the GOP will loose a minimum of 20% of their base if the elect old smegma-lips.


8 posted on 01/06/2015 7:00:42 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Call congress now. The lines didn’t seem jammed to me. I got through to offices on the first try each time. Numbers were posted in this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3242226/posts?page=22#22


9 posted on 01/06/2015 7:12:00 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Feehery ranks up there as one of the WORST insider lobbyists in DC.


10 posted on 01/06/2015 7:45:39 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Yep, kind of makes you wonder who they think is going to vote for them in 2016. Blacks? nope, Hispanics? nope, Christians?, nope, Jews?, nope. Could be they will get the midget vote. LOL


11 posted on 01/06/2015 7:55:47 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson