Thanks for the insights.
I just finished the piece. The wrap up:
“.....Read almost three decades later, Postman represents the boatman he described. Its worth noting, though, that his work is largely ignored in academia. Scholars of communications and media theory are often, though not always, enthusiastic about technological change; many of them team up against copyright protection and in favor of the cult of free. Since they dont typically earn their living from their writing or music, its easy for them to cheerlead for piracy and digital innovation that leaves artists uncompensated. (There may be other reasons, too: A communications scholar once told me that her colleagues downgraded Postmans work because it could be read by the layman.)
His work was almost too prescient, says Matt Bai. Now it seems almost like a given, like its obvious. How rare that insight is in academic or cultural criticism!
But as valuable as hes been to his work, Postmans name does not often come up inside the Beltway. My chief criticism about the new generation of political journalism and media, says Bai, who writes for Yahoo News, is that they dont have a broader curiosity about the world. They have to file 12 times a day; they dont read novels, they dont read history. So I think Postman has been a bit of a victim of the culture he foreshadowed. The technology is so dominant for a lot of people, especially younger Americans, its year zero. Whats the point of knowing what happened in 1980? Its ancient. But its hard to get a sense of whats lost until you know what was.
Jaron Lanier, who works in the Bay Area and Silicon Valley, across the continent and several cultural divides from Bais Washington, gives an eerily similar assessment of Postmans place in his world. If you feel like all information is available, you know less and your thinking becomes narrower, he says. The tech world is fairly history free, so nobody comes up. The mystery remains how to get anyone interested in history at all. In a way, Silicon Valley thinks theres only the present, and the presents ideas about the future. Whoevers alive now knows best.
Oddly, he says, Its easier to get information than ever before, but people are much less informed. Lanier thinks were still catching up to his work. I think Postmans day, he said, might not have come yet. [end]
I’ll read the article tonight- thank you for making me aware of it.
Another critic similar in many ways to Postman was Christopher Lasch. Lasch was a sociologist rather than a communications theorist, but his conclusions were similar about the direction of American culture.