Skip to comments.
29 CONSERVATIVES CAN OUST BOEHNER AS SPEAKER
Breitbart ^
| January, 2, 2015
| By DANIEL HOROWITZ
Posted on 01/02/2015 2:59:14 PM PST by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Wishful thinking, I'm afraid.
IF 29 R's were to vote for some candidate other than Boner, I would expect as many D's as necessary to defect and vote FOR him.
I believe the deal has already been struck between WH and Congress - Obama continues to rule by decree while Congress flails around in gridlock. Nothing changes except who gets blamed (the R's)
21
posted on
01/02/2015 3:26:40 PM PST
by
ZOOKER
(Until further notice the /s is implied...)
To: Jim Robinson
I’ve already contacted Marsha Blackburn’s office and told them to tell her that if she votes FOR Boehner I’ll work my butt off to primary her in 2016.
22
posted on
01/02/2015 3:28:50 PM PST
by
Fledermaus
(RINO FReepers are delusional and come January 2015 will take it up the *** again when the GOPe caves)
To: Jim Robinson
I’m sorry, I don’t see this happening. They will cave and reelect Boehner and allow Obama to continue wiping his a$$ with the Constitution..
23
posted on
01/02/2015 3:30:47 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(Certified Islamophobe..)
To: Zakeet
That picture you posted on Nancy is very scary!
What I want to know is if she can blink her eyes?
To: Zakeet
Another interesting thought is what would happen if some of the conservatives would vote with the Rats for Ms. Clueless. Boy I don't know the rules for sure, but Erik Erickson had a guest on ( or was it Erik ) explaining this... If Boenher doesn't get 218 ( and for that matter San-Fran Nan ) it is essentially a null vote and Johnny B has to run again or someone has to put their name in the hat and get the 218. If I get this correct, you can't have San-Fran Nan as speaker, It is not about her vote she's not in the majority...
25
posted on
01/02/2015 3:49:56 PM PST
by
taildragger
(Not my Circus, Not my Monkey ( Boy does that apply to DC...))
To: MtnMan101
26
posted on
01/02/2015 3:51:17 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: Eva
Do IT!!!!!
do it do it do it do it do it......
I will hand out candy to all the kids if you DO IT!!!!!
27
posted on
01/02/2015 3:51:39 PM PST
by
LtKerst
To: MtnMan101
LOL! That’s probably how he reacts when Obama talks mean to him. YOU WILL SUPPORT SCAMNESTY!! Oh boo hoo hoo yes Mr. Obama boo hoo
28
posted on
01/02/2015 3:54:09 PM PST
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Obama: 7 acts of blatant treason and counting.)
To: justlurking
The Speaker only needs a majority of the Representatives that actually vote for an individual. How did they ever dump Newt, then his replacement?(Name escapes me at the moment)
Character matters.
29
posted on
01/02/2015 3:58:07 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Shamelessly stolen img.
30
posted on
01/02/2015 4:01:22 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
To: Jim Robinson
I submit that we will know how many conservatives are in the House AFTER the vote.
31
posted on
01/02/2015 4:07:05 PM PST
by
SaxxonWoods
(Life is good.)
Support Free Republic
PO Box 9771
FResno, CA 93794
Keep freedom ALIVE!!
Thank you all very much!!
God bless.
32
posted on
01/02/2015 4:11:07 PM PST
by
RedMDer
(I don't listen to Liars but when I do I know it's Barack Obama.)
To: itsahoot
How did they ever dump Newt, then his replacement?(Name escapes me at the moment)
Gingrich was force to step down or face ethics charges regarding a book deal.
Bob Livingston, next up, stepped down due to 'zipper' problems and a mistress or a few.
33
posted on
01/02/2015 4:25:39 PM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Jim Robinson
Would this be 29 conservatives and all democrats? I may be mistaken, but both sides of the aisle vote on speakership....right?
If this is indeed the case, what would keep democrats from voting for Boehner seeing as he’d be a fairly productive “useful idiot”?
To: jazusamo
"May it be so, Boehner has got to go!"------------------------------------------------------------
This is such a no-brainer
we must overthrow Boehner.
End his stinking gutless con
and say goodbye to little John.
35
posted on
01/02/2015 4:54:32 PM PST
by
Heart-Rest
("Our hearts are restless, Lord, until they rest in Thee." - St. Augustine)
To: cardinal4
I concur. I believe the new 29 have all probably already been suborned.
36
posted on
01/02/2015 5:01:20 PM PST
by
4Runner
To: Da Coyote
hey do not sweat it. there are times that it is easier to read the writer’s intent overlook a little messed up words than split words over it. No fellow freepers will not think you graduated from Harvard or MIT, because you can at least read and do math.
37
posted on
01/02/2015 5:01:45 PM PST
by
hondact200
(Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
To: Jim Robinson
The GOP must decide whether it is the alternative to the Democrats, or merely the ‘rat-lite party.
Boehner is Rat-lite. He is not conservative. It’s past time for the Weeper to go!
38
posted on
01/02/2015 5:01:47 PM PST
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: Jim Robinson
The GOD are clearly worms. Calcium challenged, as it were.
39
posted on
01/02/2015 5:11:35 PM PST
by
Paladin2
To: Paladin2
Spel fix gets it wrong agin.
40
posted on
01/02/2015 5:13:44 PM PST
by
Paladin2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
