I noted there are legitimate issues with the method.
We are, however, or were until the recent price drop for gas, moving towards more alternative fuel vehicles. At present an electric vehicle pays zero towards road system maintenance.
That’s not a big deal when they’re one vehicle in 500. It is a big deal when it’s one in 5.
Also, as vehicles become more energy efficient, the ratio between gas taxes collected and miles traveled drops, resulting in underfunding of the system.
Don’t entirely agree with you on the bike paths part. Some reasons:
To the extent a bike path is used for commuting, which I’ve done myself, it reduces wear and tear on the roads.
Cyclists also drive cars, in most cases, so it’s not like they don’t contribute to the system.
The cost per mile of a bike path and its maintenance is miniscule compared to a road. To the extent the bike path gets cyclists off the roads it operates in the best interests of both motorists and cyclists.
Then they should be paying fees for the construction cost.
Cyclists also drive cars, in most cases, so it’s not like they don’t contribute to the system.
??? I also have a another vehicle. Should I pay taxes only on one and not the other?
The cost per mile of a bike path and its maintenance is miniscule compared to a road.
Then it won't take much money for the bicyclists to pay for them, instead of requiring those that don't use them, to pay for them.