Here’s an example of how the Assocated Press covered the issue:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78645.html
And Fox News:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/27/obama-birth-certificate-moved-secure-location-months-ago/and Fox News:
And the New York Times Archive lists 102 articles that at least mention “the birther movement” (Obama birth certificate):
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/b/birther_movement/index.html
What would have really helped to draw more mainstream media attention to this issue would have been if the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives had held committee hearings on Obama’s eligibility once they took the majority in 2011.
Another thing that would have brought media attention would have been if any prosecuting attorney, from a local District Attorney to a state’s Republican Attorney General had convened a Grand Jury investigation into document forgery and election fraud.
How can you claim to be for Palin if you don’t believe what she says?
‘What would have really helped to draw more mainstream media attention to this issue would have been if the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives had held committee hearings on Obama’s eligibility once they took the majority in 2011.’
‘PALIN/CRUZ: 2016’
Here is the question, NG. Do you not know enough about Palin to see the problem here?
Or do you know Palin’s position on the issues/political philosophy, but you despise it? I.e.: are you well aware that the first above quote, which you repeat with trollish frequency, flies in the face of one of Palin’s most basic political positions, and you get some kind of satisfaction from not-too-subtly calling her clueless and/or stupid?
It’s A or B.
Unless, of course, you have an alternative explanation for how you can claim to be a Palin backer while posting, with trollish frequency, a comment that contradicts one of Palin’s most fundamental beliefs/stances.
Odds are, given the trollish frequency with which you post a comment diametrically at odds with Palin’s political philosophy, you are a retread. Iow, a liberal, not a conservative at all. This is all the more likely since in your embarrassingly-often posted/repeated refrain, the Permanent Political Class is the solution, not the problem. [Note: that is a major hint. I.e.: in the event you have no earthly idea what Palin advocates, you can take that comment and extrapolate. After all, she is the one who coined the phrase, The Permanent Political Class...and she didn’t mean it as a compliment.]
You never heard of Reagan, it seems. On this point, he wholeheartedly agreed with Palin.
You, by contrast, disagree with both.
As well as with Mark Levin, in case you’re counting.