Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

“In response to the GAO’s recommendation, the Energy Department said a broader, long-range review of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is needed, rather than a study focused only on the size of the emergency stockpile.”

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2014/10/23/senator-time-to-rethink-our-emergency-oil-stockpile/

Of course it would mean more jobs but any number of three letter Fed Govt Agencies will stop at nothing to stonewall any attempt to repeal the ban on domestic crude exports. That’s why I say a veto-proof, strong bi-partisan bill to repeal must be crafted to pass the Senate and shove_it up 0bama’s youknowwhat.


13 posted on 12/31/2014 12:08:54 PM PST by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: shove_it
Because a surge of domestic oil production has pared the United States’ reliance on foreign crude, the country may not need to stash as much away in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, Wyden, D-Ore., said in a letter to Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz.

I suspect, Democrat Moniz is more concerned with the possible spending available from selling more oil out of the SPR.

When the SPR was first created with the 1975 Energy Policy and Conservation Act, The US was importing ~4 million barrels a day. Today we import over 7 million bpd. I do not see reasoning to reduce it.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

14 posted on 12/31/2014 12:23:31 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson