It’s pretty sickening to know that there are that many Republicans who would rather see Pelosi as Speaker again rather than vote against Boner.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Please re-read that sentence and tell me if that is what you meant to say. It doesn’t make sense. Did you mean to say: “...rather than vote FOR Boner”?
No, it's exactly what I meant. Were it the way you're suggesting, then Pelosi would be Speaker again.
As I look back at it, this may have caused the confusion:
This is how Boner and other RINOs have stayed in power because they have enough Republicans on their side to prevent challengers from not just beating them, but also outvoting the RATS meaning that voting against them puts the RATS in charge.It would be clearer to say:
This is how Boner and other RINOs have stayed in power because they have enough Republicans on their side to prevent challengers who may be able to beat them from also outvoting the RATS meaning that voting against a RINO Speaker like Boner puts the RATS in charge.Which makes this clearer:
It's pretty sickening to know that there are that many Republicans who would rather see Pelosi as Speaker again rather than vote against Boner.