Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BBB333
I'm not questioning the legitimacy of that kind of business use. My point is that there really is nothing special about that 6,000-lb. GVW requirement in most cases.

If I'm the broker/owner of a realty company and I work in a region that covers several states in the South, wouldn't it make more sense to allow me to buy a smaller vehicle under Section 179?

9 posted on 12/30/2014 5:23:41 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("The ship be sinking.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

“I’m not questioning the legitimacy of that kind of business use.”

Correction, you were questioning it.

“My point is that there really is nothing special about that 6,000-lb. GVW requirement in most cases.”

I’ll agree with you there, though I believe that this section is on the books for farm and ranch equipment - perhaps that’s where the 6,000 lb. limit derived from...

“If I’m the broker/owner of a realty company and I work in a region that covers several states in the South...”

Egad man! The MLS fees would cost you a fortune!


12 posted on 12/30/2014 5:50:12 AM PST by BBB333 (Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson