Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sphinx
I tend to emphasize attrition.

European crowd diseases did the bulk of destruction against the Indian.

12 posted on 12/27/2014 8:02:09 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by government regulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
True, but most of the great die-off occurred before European settlers met the Indians on the ground. We get glimpses of it: the accounts of the early Spanish and French explorers on the Mississippi vs. the accounts of the second wave a century later, or the observed annihilations of villages or tribes by recurring outbreaks of cholera or smallpox. But for the most part, the disease wave preceded settlement by many decades.

When I was in school, we were taught that the Europeans encountered a largely empty North American wilderness inhabited by perhaps a million Indians. This perception was based on the perfectly honest, but naïve, accounts of the early settlers. We now know that 90% or more of the Indian populations died before Europeans ever laid eyes on them. Central America, of course, is a different story.

15 posted on 12/27/2014 8:30:09 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson