Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: relictele
Agree....the media never tire of these cheesy staged scenes of a candidate walking in to ‘surprise’ the rubes at the diner.

OMG...that is soooooo true!

25 posted on 12/23/2014 2:16:55 PM PST by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: who knows what evil?

At the risk of belaboring the point...so much of the public’s perception is based on the presence of a camera.

But the public never stop to consider HOW and WHY a camera was set up in the first place.

Those ‘candid’ photos of Jennifer Aniston at the beach are taken from the water pointing at the beach. This means, of course, that the photographer must have been wading out into the water to get his camera angle (at best) or was in a boat (at worst). In either case he would be VERY conspicuous.

By the same token, so-called photojournalists who get so-called award-winning photos must usually be positioned in advance to get lighting and a stable platform.

Presidential-campaign videographers are almost always positioned in a ‘camera pit’ i.e. a predetermined location. In our internet age this is a joke. And a fraud. It’s a damn shame that so many people are suckered by it.


26 posted on 12/23/2014 2:22:48 PM PST by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson