Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brent oil $90 to $100 in 12 to 18 months: Pickens
CNBC ^ | 23 Dec 2014 | Matthew J. Belvedere

Posted on 12/23/2014 8:00:36 AM PST by shove_it

Energy entrepreneur T. Boone Pickens predicted Tuesday that Brent crude oil will be at $90 to $100 barrel in 12 to 18 months. "The world got along fine with $100 oil," he said on CNBC.

Less global demand for oil is more to blame for the price drop than oversupply, Pickens said in a "Squawk Box" interview.

"The demand for the world was another 1.3 million this year, and half of that is what we got," he continued. "The oversupply for oil has come from the United States."

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries alone can't satisfy the world's need for oil, he added. "Are they trying to test the U.S. producer? I don't know, maybe so."

In a heated exchange over "peak oil," defined as the point when extraction rates top out, Pickens defended his 2005 call, which came before the U.S. shale boom. "We did peak [for OPEC] in 2005."

"If you look at 2005, you're finished as far as for the rest of the world. What saved you was the shale. American industry saved the world one more time," he said.

He rejected assertions that he was wrong in 2005 about "peak oil" given the landscape of today's oil market.

"That's all good bulls--- and all," he said—implying that at the time there was no way to know how big the shale boom was going to be. "I'm the expert you guys, not you." With more than a half century in the oil and gas business, Pickens spent most of his career building Mesa Petroleum into a powerhouse. After selling Mesa in 1996, he founded BP Capital Management, an investment firm focusing on the energy industry...

(Excerpt) Read more at video.cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; opec; tboonepickens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
There are three 1-2 minute videos at the linked article - play them from right to left for the proper sequence. The one in the middle is quite entertaining as Joe Kearnan challenged Boone on his 'peak oil' call in 2005.
1 posted on 12/23/2014 8:00:36 AM PST by shove_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shove_it

#hopeface Meanwhile the Saudis don’t care if it goes to $20. I’ll vote with the Saudis on this one, sorry T. Boone, you greedy liar.


2 posted on 12/23/2014 8:03:08 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

I would think no one would find anything interesting from Pickens since he was crapped out as the big prophet of peak oil and solar energy.


3 posted on 12/23/2014 8:05:37 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

I read an article a few days ago about how no body every predicts oil prices right and yet, the media always interviews the same folks who got it wrong the last ten times.

Good for Joe that he called him out on the peak oil disaster. Boone has been a brilliant (and lucky) oil man for decades - but like the rest of the world, he doesn’t know what will happen in the future, and his absurd notion that “the world got along just fine with 100 oil” is bullshit to a lot of people.


4 posted on 12/23/2014 8:06:04 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Talking his long position - count on it.


5 posted on 12/23/2014 8:06:34 AM PST by quantumman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

+1

T. Boone may have been a successful exec in the past, but he has turned into nothing but a huckster.


6 posted on 12/23/2014 8:06:38 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

T.Bone is like the Master race baiter Al Sharpton of old oil....Sticking his mouth in front of any mic the media with thust at him hoping to keep relevant..


7 posted on 12/23/2014 8:07:10 AM PST by Autonomous User (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

T. Boone is a has been. Shudda stuck w/ oil and stayed away from solar.

This sounds like a desperate pump and dump to me.


8 posted on 12/23/2014 8:08:31 AM PST by upchuck (Too much ME, not enough G.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

This is the same brilliant T. “boondoggle” Pickens who was all in for wind power just a couple of years ago, right?


9 posted on 12/23/2014 8:08:31 AM PST by Baynative (Did you ever notice that atheists don't dare sue Muslims?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Dang it. I got the wrong link to start with -— start here for article I posted: http://www.cnbc.com/id/102291371


10 posted on 12/23/2014 8:09:56 AM PST by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

and wind........................


11 posted on 12/23/2014 8:12:15 AM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bkepley
I would think no one would find anything interesting from Pickens since he was crapped out as the big prophet of peak oil and solar energy.

Don't forget his wind power fiasco. -Tom

From Slashdot: In 2008, billionaire T. Boone Pickens unveiled his ‘Pickens Plan’ on national TV, which calls for America to end its dependence on foreign oil by increasing use of wind power and natural gas. Over the next two years, he spent $80 million on TV commercials and $2 billion on General Electric wind turbines.

Unfortunately market forces were not favorable to Mr. Pickens, and in December 2010 he announced that he is getting out of the wind power business.

12 posted on 12/23/2014 8:12:45 AM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse U.S. citizens and Americans. They are not necessarily the same. -tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shove_it
"I'm the expert you guys, not you."

When experts are wrong, 'no one could have known' is the catch phrase.

13 posted on 12/23/2014 8:14:31 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

I read somewhere that places like Venezuela and Russia, who survive on oil profits, are the ones who need oil priced in the $100 a barrel range. OPEC can apparently keep lowering prices until the rest of the world goes into the red pulling up their own oil or fracking shale. The question is - how will OPEC’s competitors survive the OPEC attempt to put them out of business?


14 posted on 12/23/2014 8:15:42 AM PST by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico

We probably won’t be drilling any new wells at $50 a barrel,

but there’s nothing the Saudis can do about the ones that are already in production -

UNLESS

they can get their leftwing buddies in the US gov’t to pull some regulatory mumbo jumbo on them.


15 posted on 12/23/2014 8:18:52 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

Wishful thinking on the part of Pickens.

We’ll soon see who’se right though.I just hope it’s our Petroleum producers.


16 posted on 12/23/2014 8:20:57 AM PST by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

The oil business is like any other. There are domestic oil companies that can make money at 30 dollars and there are companies that are unprofitable at 110 dollars.

Pickens is 86 years old. I think he is trying remain relative.


17 posted on 12/23/2014 8:25:56 AM PST by cork (Gun control = hitting what you aim at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

What does Pickens care ,he’s a big investor in Wind Farms ,LOL


18 posted on 12/23/2014 8:30:26 AM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
We probably won’t be drilling any new wells at $50 a barrel,

The US will drill less new wells at $50 than we would at $100, but some drilling will continue. Just as drilling continued the last time we were at $50, just a few years ago.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

19 posted on 12/23/2014 8:31:37 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: molson209

Natural Gas actually.

The wind was just a way to free up more natural gas fuel from electric power generation, before the shale gas really took off. It was back in the day when we were still building LNG import terminals because we didn’t have enough gas.

Since then T.Boone dropped the wind, kept the Nat Gas, and those LNG terminals are trying to export instead of import.

He is pushing NatGas for Vehicle Fuel, but lower prices for gasoline and diesel make it harder to justify the conversion.


20 posted on 12/23/2014 8:34:58 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson