Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beebuster2000

Doesn’t change anything.

There is no good reason an outside entity should have any means of controlling a blast furnace without being in the building.

Nothing on the internet is truly secure or ever will be.


8 posted on 12/20/2014 1:21:55 PM PST by cripplecreek (You can't half ass conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

Most water systems across the country are now monitored and controllable via the internet. Kinda like dominos, ready to fall.


10 posted on 12/20/2014 1:30:20 PM PST by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

I’d guess that the intention was a control scheme that allows an outsider to view what’s happening. Orderly shutdown should ALWAYS be in the hands of ONLY the locals, and that system should be isolated from outside view.


29 posted on 12/20/2014 3:19:34 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson